Peter Schlaufer schrieb am 03.02.21 um 11:42:
To me it seems, that this entire discussion circles around a covetousness, that
images should appear better or sharper on screen, than they are in reality
Regards Peter
good point - and this particular image is not - especially to the
To me it seems, that this entire discussion circles around a covetousness, that
images should appear better or sharper on screen, than they are in reality
Regards Peter
> Am 02.02.2021 um 22:58 schrieb Pascal Obry :
>
> Le mardi 02 février 2021 à 19:34 +0100, Kneops a écrit :
>> Well,
Terry said it better than whatever I was attempting to write. Totally agree
with him and kudos to all Devs.
Emanuele
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 23:44 Terry Pinfold wrote:
> A raw file has no sharpening applied by the camera. When you open a raw
> file in programs like Adobe's Lightroom they
A raw file has no sharpening applied by the camera. When you open a raw
file in programs like Adobe's Lightroom they automatically applied a level
of sharpness which is usually the unsharp mask approach. Darktable leaves
all of these adjustments to the users discretion. When you open a raw image
Le mardi 02 février 2021 à 19:34 +0100, Kneops a écrit :
> Well, I think I started this kind of 'topic' several times, because
> this is also my experience with using DT for a few years and one of
> the big reasons why I'm using LR for now (shame shame).
This sounds really like a troll
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:25:37 +0100
Victor wrote:
> I developed a raw image (DSC00662.ARW) taken with my sony a6600
> with both DT and RT using minimal intervention (see attached DT xmp
> file and RT pp3 file). As you can see from the details I enclosed
> in this message the RT resulting image
The darktable image is darker. Perceived sharpness also depends on
contrast. RawTherapee can apply a bunch of tricks (capture sharpening,
dual demosaicing) that darktable cannot do (dual demosaicing is on the
master branch, though). I see some CA in the darktable JPG that I
don't see on the one
Bernhard schrieb am 02.02.21 um 19:54:
Victor schrieb am 02.02.21 um 16:25:
I developed a raw image (DSC00662.ARW) taken with my sony a6600 with
both DT and RT using minimal intervention (see attached DT xmp file
and RT pp3 file). As you can see from the details I enclosed in this
Victor schrieb am 02.02.21 um 16:25:
I developed a raw image (DSC00662.ARW) taken with my sony a6600 with
both DT and RT using minimal intervention (see attached DT xmp file
and RT pp3 file). As you can see from the details I enclosed in this
message the RT resulting image looks by far
I find that if I need to denoise and/or sharpen, I'll get great results
by using Topaz DeNoise AI followed by Topaz Sharpen AI before pulling
the results into darktable for final finish work.
Willy
On 2/2/2021 at 12:36, Giulio wrote:
Il 02/02/21
Well, I think I started this kind of 'topic' several times, because this
is also my experience with using DT for a few years and one of the big
reasons why I'm using LR for now (shame shame). I always try a new DT
version for a reason to switch back, but LR sharpness is better and much
easier
Il 02/02/21 16:25, Victor ha scritto:
I developed a raw image (DSC00662.ARW) taken with my sony a6600 with
both DT and RT using minimal intervention (see attached DT xmp file and
RT pp3 file). As you can see from the details I enclosed in this message
the RT resulting image looks by far better
* Victor [02-02-21 10:29]:
> I developed a raw image (DSC00662.ARW) taken with my sony a6600 with both DT
> and RT using minimal intervention (see attached DT xmp file and RT pp3
> file). As you can see from the details I enclosed in this message the RT
> resulting image looks by far better in
don't expect darktable to do the stuff automagicly for you - there're a
couple of modules to tweak sharpness - but it is up to you to make use of
them...
Am Di., 2. Feb. 2021 um 16:26 Uhr schrieb Victor :
> I developed a raw image (DSC00662.ARW) taken with my sony a6600 with both
> DT and RT
I developed a raw image (DSC00662.ARW) taken with my sony a6600 with
both DT and RT using minimal intervention (see attached DT xmp file and
RT pp3 file). As you can see from the details I enclosed in this message
the RT resulting image looks by far better in terms of sharpness with
respect to
15 matches
Mail list logo
