well, of course, if the feature was implemented in Darktable, the work
flow would be easier and cleaner.
On 17/11/2017 17:12, FK wrote:
> Am 15.11.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Lorenzo Bolzani:
>>
>> The very fact that you need a second program, o a second manual pass
>> with a find -exec DT, means, to
With all due respect to the great work of the developers, I agree: +1
Emanuele
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 5:12 PM, FK wrote:
> Am 15.11.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Lorenzo Bolzani:
>
>
> The very fact that you need a second program, o a second manual pass with
> a find -exec
Am 15.11.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Lorenzo Bolzani:
>
> The very fact that you need a second program, o a second manual pass
> with a find -exec DT, means, to me, that something is wrong for such a
> simple and common task.
>
+1
* darkta...@911networks.com [11-15-17 13:01]:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:55:42 -0800
> darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
>
>
> >I use mogrify for shrinking the file size, sharpening and adding a
> >frame with a copyright. Then I use exiftool to remove the DT
>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:55:42 -0800
darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
>I use mogrify for shrinking the file size, sharpening and adding a
>frame with a copyright. Then I use exiftool to remove the DT
>information and to add the missing iptc info.
>
>.
>mogrify -quality 70 -unsharp
On mercredi 15 novembre 2017 16:35:10 CET Lorenzo Bolzani wrote:
> 2017-11-14 8:03 GMT+01:00 :
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017, at 22:29, Lorenzo Bolzani wrote:
> > > I'm quite sure that all processing is applied before downscale (this has
> > > been discussed before). And
2017-11-14 8:03 GMT+01:00 :
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017, at 22:29, Lorenzo Bolzani wrote:
> > I'm quite sure that all processing is applied before downscale (this has
> > been discussed before). And sharpening is mostly lost after downscale.
>
> This depends on whether "do
To my knowledge, all pixel destructive operations like "resize" and
"sharpen" should be done only once, in this order, as last action, and
in accordance with the destination output (screen, paper).
-Gian
On 15/11/2017 05:43, I. Ivanov wrote:
> Is it a "limitation" that resizing has to be last or
On 2017-11-14 09:18, Paul Deverson wrote:
> Personally, I don’t sharpen in dt at all. I export unsharpened to a
> tiff and then pre-sharpen using Nik Sharpener inside GIMP and then
> output sharpen using Nik after resizing.
>
> Works for me!
Yes, of course that's an option. When using other
Personally, I don’t sharpen in dt at all. I export unsharpened to a tiff and
then pre-sharpen using Nik Sharpener inside GIMP and then output sharpen using
Nik after resizing.
Works for me!
Paul.
> On 11-14-2017, at 8:55 AM, Šarūnas wrote:
>
> On 2017-11-13 20:34,
On 2017-11-13 20:34, Robert William Hutton wrote:
> On 14/11/17 12:22, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
>> What are you doing/using for sharpening after export? My export sizes
>> are around 900px jpegs for
>> web with a quality of 70% for my 20Mpx and 24Mpx cameras.
>
> Isn't this what export
On mardi 14 novembre 2017 08:21:13 CET Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Hi,
> If you want really to do something "after", then do it "outside".
> You can do that in GIMP and you can even use the existing lua script to
> call GIMP directly from dt.
>
> Jean-Luc
Of course that's an option, but I'd
Hi,
If you want really to do something "after", then do it "outside".
You can do that in GIMP and you can even use the existing lua script to
call GIMP directly from dt.
Jean-Luc
2017-11-14 8:03 GMT+01:00 :
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017, at 22:29, Lorenzo Bolzani wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017, at 22:29, Lorenzo Bolzani wrote:
> I'm quite sure that all processing is applied before downscale (this has
> been discussed before). And sharpening is mostly lost after downscale.
This depends on whether "do high quality resampling during export" is checked
in "core
I'm quite sure that all processing is applied before downscale (this has
been discussed before). And sharpening is mostly lost after downscale.
What I do is to reopen all the small exported files with DT, apply
sharpening on the first one (with different parameters than before as the
file is
* darkta...@911networks.com [11-14-17 00:30]:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:33:01 -0500
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> >don't you apply sharpening during you edit. you do realize that dt
> >has a specific order that it applies the edits you prescribe on
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:33:01 -0500
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>don't you apply sharpening during you edit. you do realize that dt
>has a specific order that it applies the edits you prescribe on
>export. if you assigned sharpening during your edit, it is applied
>to the
* darkta...@911networks.com [11-13-17 21:38]:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:34:28 +1100
> Robert William Hutton wrote:
>
> >On 14/11/17 12:22, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
> >> What are you doing/using for sharpening after export? My export
> >>
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:34:28 +1100
Robert William Hutton wrote:
>On 14/11/17 12:22, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
>> What are you doing/using for sharpening after export? My export
>> sizes are around 900px jpegs for web with a quality of 70% for my
>> 20Mpx and 24Mpx
On 14/11/17 12:22, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
What are you doing/using for sharpening after export? My export sizes are
around 900px jpegs for
web with a quality of 70% for my 20Mpx and 24Mpx cameras.
Isn't this what export styles are for?
Hi,
What are you doing/using for sharpening after export?
My export sizes are around 900px jpegs for web with a quality of 70%
for my 20Mpx and 24Mpx cameras.
DT 2.2.5 on arch.
--
sknahT
vyS
darktable user mailing
21 matches
Mail list logo