Re: [Solved] Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:40:39 -0800 "I. Ivanov" wrote: >It is good that it works for you (one way or another). I usually >export @95% and it seems to work well quality vs size. But perhaps >you have reasons to compress further I didn't try higher >compressions. Try webpages

Re: [Solved] Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

It is good that it works for you (one way or another). I usually export @95% and it seems to work well quality vs size. But perhaps you have reasons to compress further I didn't try higher compressions. Regards, B On 2017-01-18 02:36 PM, darkta...@911networks.com wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

No I didn't... but the images were @100%. I just wanted to point out that the viewer can influence the perception. Based on what I have seen I believe DT is working as expected. The way how the other viewers render the image however can vary significantly. But it is not really a DT issue.

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

I think part of the effect (in addition to what the others have found out) is the viewer that you are using. This is in Geeqie - color matched exported at 900 dpi and seen @ 100% https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek5e3me3haq3dn2/Screenshot%20from%202017-01-17%2020-33-12.png?dl=0 This is Geeqie -

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:21:54 -0800 "I. Ivanov" wrote: >You may want to provide a raw file and xmp so we can test. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7HTmJCO2gG7WDl1NUVxbVQ3aGs/view?usp=sharing -- sknahT vyS

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:23:54 +0100 Remco Viëtor wrote: >But what do you do exactly in that extra style you apply on export? Only frame and watermark >And what's the exact command you use to mogrify your images? it was: mogrify -quality "85%" -resize 900x900 but I did

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2017, 08:16:46 CET schrieb Matthieu Moy: [...] > You're viewing your images at a zoom level different from 100%, so you're > not only benchmarking your rescaling tool (dt Vs mogrify), but also your > image viewer's rescaling. > > Don't do that. If you want to compare the

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

- Original Message - > From: darkta...@911networks.com > To: darktable-user@lists.darktable.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 3:35:51 AM > Subject: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2) > Hi, > > DT 2.2.1 on arch > > I'm still having problems with the export: 900x900. > > Here are

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

On lundi 16 janvier 2017 18:35:51 CET darkta...@911networks.com wrote: > Hi, > > DT 2.2.1 on arch > > I'm still having problems with the export: 900x900. > > Here are my settings: http://i.imgur.com/QS74VlT.png > But what do you do exactly in that extra style you apply on export? And what's

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

You may want to provide a raw file and xmp so we can test. I can't see a huge difference on my images. There may be but the resolution is rather small - 900dpi. In the core options there is "high quality re sampling during export". This option would interfere however with "dithering" (if I

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:54:15 -0500 Patrick Shanahan wrote: >youtube darktable tutorial sharpening I didn't googled, I youtubed (if that can be converted to a verb) and only found: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhMR88Jt6nk Using Drawn Masks in Darktable to Sharpen Select

Re: [darktable-user] Sharpening (round 2)

* darkta...@911networks.com [01-16-17 21:37]: > Hi, > > DT 2.2.1 on arch > > I'm still having problems with the export: 900x900. > > Here are my settings: http://i.imgur.com/QS74VlT.png > > Here is a comparison: http://i.imgur.com/BzbRfbs.png > > * left: full, no