On Tue, 4 Jan 2022, 01:14 Niranjan Rao, wrote:
> On 12/31/21 3:01 PM, Bernhard wrote:
> >
> >
> > Niranjan Rao schrieb am 31.12.21 um 23:53:
> >> I don't have camera anymore to contribute but do have images which
> >> were supported at one time.
> > This I don't understand:
> > Looks as if this
On 12/31/21 3:01 PM, Bernhard wrote:
Niranjan Rao schrieb am 31.12.21 um 23:53:
I don't have camera anymore to contribute but do have images which
were supported at one time.
This I don't understand:
Looks as if this camera provides
4.000 x 3.000 Pixel (4:3)
2.816 x 2.112 Pixel
I thought I read that you cannot access photos processed in 3.6 if you upgrade
to 3.8. Is this correct, or am I confused again?
From: Terry Pinfold
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 3:04 PM
To: darktable-user@lists.darktable.org ;
Jean-Luc CECCOLI
Subject: Re:
There is a really nice sharpening preset in the diffuse or sharpen module.
Worth the upgrade.
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 09:42, RE Blue wrote:
> Yes, that has always been my understanding. Unless there's a whole new
> change in direction, newer versions of software are backward compatible.
> That's
Yes, that has always been my understanding. Unless there's a whole new change
in direction, newer versions of software are backward compatible. That's good
to know, because I have held out moving to 3.8 for fear of losing all my 3.6
photos. Thanks everyone for your information and assistance.
The database and xmps might be corrupted when reverting to an earlier version.
That's why darktable creates a backup of the database with the first start of a
new version.
You might use this backup when reverting.
Terry Pinfold schrieb am 03.01.22 um 22:39:
My understanding is images edited in
that's correct - and that's how most software works.
(this is logical: new versions know the algorithms of old versions, but old
versions are not clairvoyants who can predict the algorithms of new versions)
Jean-Luc CECCOLI schrieb am 03.01.22 um 22:25:
If I understood correctly, photos edited
Thank you for the clarification.
From: Jean-Luc CECCOLI
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 3:25 PM
To: Terry Pinfold ;
darktable-user@lists.darktable.org ; RE
Blue
Subject: Re: [darktable-user] darktable 3.8.0 released
If I understood correctly, photos edited
My understanding is images edited in a later version of darktable would
normally not be correctly edited in a previous version of DT if someone chose
to revert to an earlier version. That would often be the case with any program,
not just Darktable. It would be unusual to want to revert DT to a
My edits from 3.6 have been faithfully carried over to 3.8. Maybe someone else
has had a different experience. BTW, when I do an edit, I always export the
image as a 16-bit to produce a new image file with the look I want. Then later
when I get a new version of DT or my skills improve over the
If I understood correctly, photos edited with 3.8 will not be editable with 3.6, but 3.8 can handle previous versions.Rgrds,envoyé : 3 janvier 2022 à 22:20de : RE Blue à : Terry Pinfold , "darktable-user@lists.darktable.org" , Jean-Luc CECCOLI objet : Re: [darktable-user] darktable 3.8.0
* Terry Pinfold [01-03-22 16:06]:
>
>
> It is a sad world when we have to worry about top or bottom posting. Just as
> long as we are posting. Let our web-based clients do as they want. DT 3.8 is
> a great improvement over 3.6. Filmic works a little nicer, the LMMSE demosiac
> option is
It is a sad world when we have to worry about top or bottom posting. Just as
long as we are posting. Let our web-based clients do as they want. DT 3.8 is a
great improvement over 3.6. Filmic works a little nicer, the LMMSE demosiac
option is incredible for reducing noise in high ISO images,
Hello,Happy new year to all, and many thanks to every dt involved.Sorry for top-posting, maybe time for me to leave Orange web-based client. :-(I got another update today. Maybe some fixes ?Rgrds,J.-Lucenvoyé : 26 décembre 2021 à 22:34de : Jean-Luc CECCOLI à :
14 matches
Mail list logo
