Re: [darktable-user] Re: display bug on mac (DT 2.0.6 and 2.0.5)

2016-09-21 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2016, 14:32:11 CEST schrieb laurent wawrzyniak: > Thanks Tobias and Daniel for your answers. > > Thanks for the ctrl+H tip, it works correctly even if sometimes,it freezes > for no reason. > > For the darktable.css, I wasn't able to find it.What is the complete path >

[darktable-user] darktable 2.0.x library

2016-09-21 Thread Sascha Oleszczuk
Hi All, are there any recommendation regarding the sqlite db (library). 1.) do you perform a backup? 2.) is there a critical amount of images it can manage? or do you import all your images and never perform a cleanup? Thx Sascha

Re: [darktable-user] darktable 2.0.x library

2016-09-21 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Sascha Oleszczuk [09-21-16 09:33]: > Hi All, > > are there any recommendation regarding the sqlite db (library). > > 1.) do you perform a backup? daily > 2.) is there a critical amount of images it can manage? I have +80k > or do you import all your images yes

Re: [darktable-user] Re: darktable 2.0.x library

2016-09-21 Thread Pascal Obry
Le mercredi 21 septembre 2016 à 17:54 +, Helge Hielscher a écrit : > Bob Keefer wrote at dpreview that he had to switch to digikam for > his  > 50,000 images: >   https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4047509 Strange since some of us have far more than 50k images. It was even reported by a

[darktable-user] Re: darktable 2.0.x library

2016-09-21 Thread Helge Hielscher
Hello Sascha, my first post through gmane did not get through, so here is my second attempt. On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:31:01 +0200, Sascha Oleszczuk wrote: > 1.) do you perform a backup? > 2.) is there a critical amount of images it can manage? or do you import > all your images and never perform

Re: [darktable-user] Re: darktable 2.0.x library

2016-09-21 Thread Frank J.
Am 21.09.2016 um 20:00 schrieb Pascal Obry: .. > Strange since some of us have far more than 50k images. It was even > reported by a user that he had 100k images IIRC. > > Maybe he reached an issue with the "old" mipmap cache? > > Not sure, but to me dt is fast for everything. > I have nearly

Re: [darktable-user] Re: darktable 2.0.x library

2016-09-21 Thread August Schwerdfeger
I have found that Darktable's performance depends far less on the overall number of *images* in the database than on the lexical properties of the *tags* in the database. I have one database with well over 50,000 images, with which I notice no performance problems, and another database with about