Le 15/01/2016 02:45, darkta...@911networks.com a écrit :
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:34:07 +0100
> Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>
>> What CPU and GPU do you have? That doesn't sound right. Please try
>> disabling OpenCL to see if it gets faster. And try running darktable
>> with "-d perf" to see where t
Le 17/08/2015 15:18, Stéphane Gourichon a écrit :
>
>
> Has anyone similarly felt that applying a module to chroma only
> increased luma noise ?
>
yes, same pbm here (using profile denoise)
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
http://
Le 02/07/2015 14:38, Martin Schoepf a écrit :
> Ok, it is a really simple one and mostly copy/pasted from the example,
> but here you go :)
>
>
[...]
>
> The script could be improved, but for my needs it was sufficient.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
sure, thank you very much :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 01/07/2015 21:39, Šarūnas Burdulis a écrit :
>
> The latter would be what I do.
>
> Minimal processing from RAW to TIFF; highlight recovery and WB
> adjustment, if needed.
>
> Panorama TIFF from Hugin then processed in Gimp. Crop, color
> balanc
Le 01/07/2015 15:58, Martin Schoepf a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I usually perform the same actions as Steve in 1.
> and have a lua script written, that exports the images as jpgs and start
> hugin with the exported jpgs.
> Than continiue with step 4. and 5. from Emmanuel.
>
> If you want I could share th
Le
>
> Not ideal using a number of JPGs, but I've not noticed a terrible
> quality loss. I also used JPGs because by the time I finished
> processing everything, I had over 16GB of JPGs and CR2 raw files.
>
> At least, that's my workflow.
>
>
yes, it saves space, thought if you wan't to post-pro
Dear DT users,
I'm curious about the process fom people doing panorama of multiple
pictures.
Usually, I do:
1 - basic processing of each image in DT
2 - export as tiff with highest size
3 - process tiff with hugin
4 - import hugin final tiff in DT
5 - adjust final tiff in DT
I do not really kno
Le 28/02/2015 08:43, Dave a écrit :
> Hi
>
> When you say it's not perfect, can you be more specific?
>
I try to keep the snow flakes smooth to preserve the ambient "smoke".
Thought I wan't to keep a bit of sharpening for everything else.
> In the sharpen module I used the parametric mode and pus
Le 27/02/2015 18:56, David Vincent-Jones a écrit :
>
> I used the equalizer and pulled down the fine detail in the luma tab that
> appears to be one solution.
>
>
without a bit of parametric mask, it also pull down the fine details of
white trees for example.
Le 27/02/2015 18:46, Dave a écrit :
>
> Hello.
> On G+ there is an excellent group called Edit My RAW.
> Members edit each others photos.
> It's educational.
> Your problem with masking is perfect for that community.
>
>
interesting, thanks for the hint:)
--
Dear DT users,
I tried to exclude snowflakes from the sharpening module using a
parametric mask with L excluding high lights, but it's not perfect. Does
anyone have an idea on a better way?
if you wan't to play, here is a raw:
http://manu.home-dn.net/darktable/IMG_1238.CR2
On 04/09/2014 15:18, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> you can change brightness/contrast, see settings->shortcuts->global
> f7, f8, f9, f10
> settings are held in ~/config/darktable/darktablerc
> I prefer: ui_brightness=1
>ui_contrast=-0.05
>
>
> also you can control colors, etc. sett
ou mean here? It's not possible to put a vertical image as
head??
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
http://www.home-dn.net/
--
Slashdot TV.
gt; Only for images that are grouped the 'G' is shown on
> the thumbnail.
>
not here, but I'm going to upgrade DT this evening and check again.
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
http://www.home-dn.net/
--
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:51:44PM +0200, thokster wrote:
>
> Try to activate the "G" and the star beneath.
>
already tried :(
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
htt
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:24:22PM +0200, thokster wrote:
> Ok, sorry!
>
> But this G is for switching in group-mode.
> The one on the thumbnails will appear then.
>
not here :(
my git is not really up-to-date (one or two weeks ago), let's upgrade
then debug this ;)
--
Em
e thumbnail to do this.
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
http://www.home-dn.net/
--
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
Dear DT users,
the manual say that We have to click on the "G" of the image thumbnail
to make it the head of the current group...On git master, I cannot find
this "G" symbol :(
Bug, eyes tired?
--
Slashdot TV.
Video fo
tutorials in that playlist too, if you can stand
> the sound of my voice.
>
That mostly the problem, I had to cut down the sound :-D
Seriously, I already saw your tutorial, thank you very much, I still
have to watch it again...
--
Emman
to happen with this?
(I do not have acces to my DT yet and I'm curious ;))
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
http://www.home-dn.net/
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'
On 06/02/2014 18:30, Robert William Hutton wrote:
> On 06/02/14 16:50, brami ary wrote:
>> With the help of two other photo-bloggers, I just publish on my blog a
>> développement match between Lightroom and Darktable.
>> It's the tird time that we do this sort of match.
>> I let you decide who did
On 07/02/2014 21:37, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 18:30, Robert William Hutton wrote:
>> On 06/02/14 16:50, brami ary wrote:
>>> With the help of two other photo-bloggers, I just publish on my blog a
>>> développement match between Lightroom and Darktable.
>
Message original
Objet : Rép: Re: [Darktable-users] 100% view in light table
De : Emmanuel Lacour
À : Christian Iuga
Cc :
I also would ligne 100% zoom with ability toi compare multiple pictures to
compare small détails or sharpness. What avoir creating another screen
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:35:51PM +0200, Matthias Vonken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I experience the same problem as ist was stated by Marcin Sikora earlier
> this year. If I import my pictures (around 5.500 in several folders) to
> DT, switching from DR to LT takes about 30 seconds, starting DT consumes
On 02/07/2013 22:49, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> I'm going to create a redmine bug to track it.
>
http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issues/9493
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for
On 02/07/2013 22:04, johannes hanika wrote:
>
>
> comparisons to the jpg are really very useless.
yes, but it doesn't mean DT shouldn't provide a default WB as close as
possible to the real one (not the jpg one). This may end up having an
"auto WB" in darkroom that may even give better result th
On 02/07/2013 20:10, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
>
> I just downloaded three random 5DmkII samples from photographyblog,
> and imported them into darktable-1.1.x which has the same temperature
> code as git master.
>
> I got the following three Kelvin values for shots that seem to have
> been shot in p
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 06:17:01PM +0200, johannes hanika wrote:
>
>i second that. sounds like your camera has some special needs wrt white
>balance. maybe we fail to read anything useful from that file and fall
>back to idiotic default multipliers that we dream up as last resort. oh,
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:07:12PM +0200, johannes hanika wrote:
>
>that's probably the embedded jpg vs processed raw story here. embedded jpg
>thumbs aren't color managed etc. at some point i'll be tired of explaining
>it and just delete the code that loads those broken jpg thumbnails
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 06:54:02PM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in recent git master, temperature seems to have lost (without effect) 1K
> or 2K from the standard values. For example, now daylight is 3349K when
> to my knowledge it should be near 5000K.
>
> What
Hi,
in recent git master, temperature seems to have lost (without effect) 1K
or 2K from the standard values. For example, now daylight is 3349K when
to my knowledge it should be near 5000K.
What hapened, is this the wanted value?
On 30/05/2013 20:52, Guilherme Brondani Torri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a/the translator for pt_BR. Now that 1.2.1 is out I have a question
> which might be relevant given the number of unmaintained translations.
>
> I noticed that Simon set up a project on Transifex [1] for Darktable.
> It seems to
On 19/05/2013 22:21, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as a highly performant OpenCL device consider a Radeon HD7950 or better.
>
before I spent so much money in this, can someone share the average
thumbnail generation time (from raw, not from embedded jpeg) difference
with and without such card?
On 20/05/2013 22:02, johannes hanika wrote:
>
>
> > undo that to make thumb creation faster (reset to default)
> >
>
> yes, but in my case, it would have no effect as I'm working on tagging
> pictures that were all already processed in darkroom.
>
>
> yes it would.
>
I see no dif
On 20/05/2013 12:34, johannes hanika wrote:
>
> - don't use embedded preview jpeg but half-size raw: checked
>
>
> undo that to make thumb creation faster (reset to default)
>
yes, but in my case, it would have no effect as I'm working on tagging
pictures that were all already processed in da
On 19/05/2013 22:35, Derek Kite wrote:
> I found that increasing to 16 gb of memory made a difference. My works
> flow is to edit the image, switch to light table to save. With 8 gb I
> would have to wait till the thumbnail was rendered, which would be
> seconds. With 16gb it its almost instantaneo
On 19/05/2013 22:21, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as a highly performant OpenCL device consider a Radeon HD7950 or better.
>
Thanks for the hint, I have to think on this ... it's not "cheap" :(
--
AlienVault Unified S
On 19/05/2013 22:09, Anocha yimsiriwattana wrote:
> Just wonder what version of DT you are using?
>
You're right, I forgot this. I'm running git master.
--
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers c
Dear DT users, hackers,
I start to be tired of the LT thumbnail generation time on my computer.
Here is my HW setup:
- images files on a standard SATA drive
- OS, .config, .cache on an SSD drive
- Memory: 8Go
- CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor (4 coeurs)
- Graphic card: embedded ATI RS780
On 16/05/2013 14:25, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> The foundation always sits under the roof I think :D)
>
that's a common preference option to allow user to invert such sort
order ... imho ;)
>
> On 13-05-13 03:35 PM, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>> On Mon, May 13, 2
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:15:16AM -0700, Lucas Krech wrote:
>What I keep hearing from the developers is that they are interested in
>making a product in the latter class of professional grade software.
I also want this, but a "professional grade software" should also have
way to do things
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:05:06AM +0200, jeremy rosen wrote:
>
>again "active module" is the way to go for that.�
>
well, for myself, I missed this, because I mainly stay in "favorites"
tab.
it's true that everything is here to do the job, thought the history
proposed enhancements may save
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 08:52:46AM +, Rob Z. Smith wrote:
>To give a contrary opinion I consider the history stack is more than
>sufficient for any reasonable purpose. Like all things if an improved
>version were made available I would no doubt appreciate it – but there are
>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:52:38AM +0200, Christian Iuga wrote:
>
>But this it, we have several issue :
>- after a reverted back (without warning) , we can't redo
>- we can't disable a specific module from history stack (like only the 4 :
>local contrast for exemple)
>- if we w
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:26:54PM +0200, Marie-Noëlle Augendre wrote:
>If I'm not mistaken, with the current procedure, you loose all the work
>that has already been done after this module if you access it via the
>history.
>
Yes I do this sometimes by mistake when I click on an histo
y*
> the "favorites" folder?
+1, first at top, last at bottom would make more sense.
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
http://www.home-dn.net/
--
Learn Graph Databases - Do
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:46:42AM +0100, Jens Fendler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like this collapse-all-others option, as it helps great deals in
> keeping the gui clean while working with a somewhat larger set of
> modules. But I suggest changing two small things:
>
> - two separate options in the gu
On 12/05/2013 12:54, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> This is something that is in the roadmap, and will eventually be
> implemented at some point. I hope it can be done in this series and be
> available in the next major release, but I can't promise anything.
>
nice :)
with magnifying zoom? (In
the croping; when
>opening the removal tool, the image appears in its entirety, whatever
>cropping has been previously applied.
>
yes there is a bug with crop + spot removal, see:
http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issues/8884
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.ho
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:21:15PM +1100, Russell Edwards wrote:
> Often I feel colours look different in the lighttable. Usually I assume
> this is a trick of the eye (brain).
>
> But just now I have found one that is obviously so.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/4an7w05ncqsfcaz/IMGP0214.DNG
>
>
ere:
https://truck.it/p/5-oFNYNtAY
if someone want to try it in DT ;)
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and m
the whole process)?
--
Emmanuel LACOUR - elac...@home-dn.net
http://manu.home-dn.net/
http://www.home-dn.net/
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and mu
Does someone know a way in DT to lower the effect of banding on this
camera pictures when raising up the lightness of dark parts of a
picture.
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remot
On 01/12/2012 20:31, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> And enable filmstrip with ctrl-f
>
Or without, and hitting "space" or "backspace" do go to next or previous
picture.
(for those where thumbnail rendering is still slow ;))
-
On 01/12/2012 20:00, Marcin Kozak wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am working on an image. I need to copy the history stack to another
> image or two.
> Is that possible to do without switching back to the lighttable module?
>
Sure, hit "ctrl C" then "Ctrl V" :)
-
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:14:18PM +0100, Christian Tellefsen wrote:
> You could try the following: (1.1-rc or git master)
>
which I'm running :)
> Select the two or more pictures to compare.
>
> Press and hold Z
>
> Use mouse scroll wheel or arrow keys to switch between images.
>
nice, I'll
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Dave wrote:
> Hiya
>
> You could duplicate the image , edit, then view them zoomed up in Lightable
> mode too
You can't view side-by-side two pictures with 100% zoom in lighttable
(or i'm missing some shortcut?).
I loved this when I was using digikam
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:19:10AM +, Will McGugan wrote:
> Ah, I hadn't discovered that. Useful, but I think I'd still prefer a dual
> view though. So I can see the entire changes without moving a slider.
>
I also don't use often this feature.
My wishes would be something like the light pan
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 09:53:54AM +, Will McGugan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One feature that I miss from Lightroom is the ability to display a before
> and after image side by side. I find it difficult to judge the accumulative
> effect of any applied filters otherwise. Could Darktable support this at
59 matches
Mail list logo
