On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:51:14PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:17:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > It says that the 64 bit operations are the same as the 32 bit ones,
> > that's why I'm confused.
>
> Ah, klibc must be undefining stat64, which then causes stru
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:17:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> It says that the 64 bit operations are the same as the 32 bit ones,
> that's why I'm confused.
Ah, klibc must be undefining stat64, which then causes struct
stat64 to be undeclared.
I'll look into it.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herb
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:04:01PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > on top of the two easy patches I sent I am seeing this one:
> > usr/dash/exec.c: In function ???find_command???:
> > usr/dash/exec.c:290: error: storage size of ???statb??? isn???t known
> > usr/dash/exec.c:
maximilian attems wrote:
> on top of the two easy patches I sent I am seeing this one:
> usr/dash/exec.c: In function ‘find_command’:
> usr/dash/exec.c:290: error: storage size of ‘statb’ isn’t known
> usr/dash/exec.c:299: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘stat64’
> usr/dash/exec.c:290: w
on top of the two easy patches I sent I am seeing this one:
usr/dash/exec.c: In function ‘find_command’:
usr/dash/exec.c:290: error: storage size of ‘statb’ isn’t known
usr/dash/exec.c:299: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘stat64’
usr/dash/exec.c:290: warning: unused variable ‘statb’
make
