On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 12:07:45PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> forwarded 455828 upstream
> quit
>
> Hi Herbert, please see http://bugs.debian.org/455828 and below. I agree
> that this is a bug in dash, sorry, I can't suggest a patch.
I've fixed as below.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www
Mark Mentovai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> autoconf provides AC_SYS_LARGEFILE for this, but I don't think it
> should be part of this patch. Does dash have a bug tracker where this
> can be filed?
Please use the Debian BTS for this. See http://bugs.debian.org/.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at
Rocky Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice dash doesn't seem to have a --restricted option like bash or
> come as a restricted shell like ksh (rksh).
>
> Thought and comments?
POSIX rationale says:
The options associated with a restricted shell (command name rsh
and th
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:51:58PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> LSB-3.1 requires /bin/sh to understand -l option. Patch by Eric.
Thank you. Since -l shouldn't be set by set, I've added this
patch instead. The profile part is fixed in a previous patch.
Ch
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:22:41PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> I've fixed as below.
You'll also want these two patches.
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org
