I have added introduction section. Feel free to edit.
https://hackmd.io/@thejeshgn/rJNzVAyoD
Thej
--
Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID : 0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 01:02, Thejesh GN wrote:
> I have added a document here
>
>
I have added a document here
https://hackmd.io/@thejeshgn/rJNzVAyoD
Anyone can login and edit or comment.
I can close the editing on 9th or 10th so we can send it in time
I have added sections for each chapter. You can add comments there.
Let's do this.
Thej
--
Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
Dear Ved,
I agree that may be the reason. But I am wondering if it is a good
enough reason. In all new technologies, state agencies have the capacity
and the onus to take risks and carry out R that will speed up their
deployment, iron out kinks and concerns, ensure that the technologies
I think the reason why Department of Space might not be commenting much on
drones or UAV for that matter is that,in India drones are mainly used for
strategic purposes in order to fortify India's defences . Commercial use of
drone requires registration in India which could be a bit tedious process
Some responses inline below
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 12:46 PM Sharad Lele wrote:
> I think Thejesh's idea of a joint response is excellent, and am happy to
> contribute.
> My immediate observation is that
> a) the RS policy does not cover drones/UAVs, which according to me is the
> hot area,
I think Thejesh's idea of a joint response is excellent, and am happy to
contribute.
My immediate observation is that
a) the RS policy does not cover drones/UAVs, which according to me is the
hot area, where a lot of application development is also required. The UAV
related policy by DGCA is
Rajya Sabha TV just now called saying the programme got cancelled. Typical
of them.
On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 10:15:42 PM UTC+5:30 Sharad Lele wrote:
> Btw, I will be appearing on Rajya Sabha TV tomorrow at 1pm with MoES Secy
> for a panel discussion on this new policy. So do send in
Btw, I will be appearing on Rajya Sabha TV tomorrow at 1pm with MoES Secy
for a panel discussion on this new policy. So do send in more comments
tonight/tomorrow morning, AND listen in on that discussion.
On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 10:14:16 PM UTC+5:30 Sharad Lele wrote:
> I agree with
I agree with you, Ujaval. Getting 5.6m data in the public domain will be a
big boost.
But I am curious to know from others what their experience has been with
the quality of this 5.6m (IRS P6) data. For instance, I found the spectral
quality to be rather poor: it boasts of being 10-bit but
Hello Thej,
Definitely, we should send comments to mention data to be in 'government
open data license'
We should reach out to like-minded orgs ?
1. Space Federation of India https://www.spacefed.in/
2. Association of Geospatial Industries (AGI) - http://agiindia.com/
3. Indian National
Hi Sharad,
Thanks for sharing. From the perspective of sharing ISRO's own data, the
policy says
" In the interest of promoting research, innovation, societal applications
and value addition, DOS shall make IRS satellite data having GSD of 5 meter
and coarser, easily accessible on ‘free and open’
Thank you for sharing. We should send out comments as community.
Thej
--
Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID : 0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 19:30, Sharad Lele (शरच्चंद्र लेले) <
sharad.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please read and comment.
>
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
