Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

> > Dilip, >>> >> I just saw the e-mail in my SPAM folder. Replied to the e-mail. Thanks! -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

Dilip, I never received it? Can you e-mail me? justinelliotmey...@gmail.com Thanks On Saturday, September 23, 2017 at 1:23:00 PM UTC-4, Dilip Damle wrote: > > HI, > I have sent it as a private response > > > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 5:33:33 PM UTC+5:30, Justin wrote: >> >> thanks. As

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

HI, I have sent it as a private response On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 5:33:33 PM UTC+5:30, Justin wrote: > > thanks. As soon as you send it, I can compare with what I have and send > you two or three versions of villages for that area. > > I know sometimes generalized data for

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

thanks. As soon as you send it, I can compare with what I have and send you two or three versions of villages for that area. I know sometimes generalized data for boundaries is good enough. But the higher quality, more detailed data going into any dataset would be best. Then you can generalize if

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

Hi, Will send in a day or two privately. I have at least two versions. On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 3:07:44 PM UTC+5:30, Justin wrote: > > Dilip, > Can you send your boundaries? I can send back what I have so you can > compare and tell me if they are truly good enough > > Thanks >

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

Dilip, Can you send your boundaries? I can send back what I have so you can compare and tell me if they are truly good enough Thanks Justin Thanks On Sep 20, 2017 2:24 AM, "Dilip Damle" wrote: > >>This is not complete for all of India. The boundaries are also heavily >

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

>>This is not complete for all of India. The boundaries are also heavily generalized. I think a Good enough Spatial data for useful boundaries, I mean a usable boundary at ground level Does not exist. At least in digital form. I am working on a Block in Uttrakhand and trying to make as good

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

Thanks for the update, may be analysing case by case in state level could give ways to merge your repository with this project. I am trying to work on it. -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

This is not complete for all of India. The boundaries are also heavily generalized. Thanks for the update On Sep 19, 2017 9:47 PM, "nishadh" wrote: > Hi Justin, > > I am in need of such data. The dataset having 2001-2011 will be much > helpful in understanding air

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

enclosing a mapping of 2001-2011 village / town codes. these files were retrieved from http://egovstandards.gov.in/code-directories-of- generic-data-elements-for-land-region-codification (link at bottom), quite some time back, though that link no longer works. the big 'missing link' here is urban

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

Yes, by chance did you see I uploaded the entire India Village data set? That is by far the most detailed data said I have seen out of India besides this data set. Let me know what you think about that area or if you have any specific questions or concerns thanks On Aug 24, 2017 11:27 PM, "Nikhil

Re: [datameet] Re: India GIS Data Update/ Questions

Yep, this is good, and the license text from MRSAC being there is significant. There is a column to differentiate between village, gap etc which may also be very helpful. It's only having census 2001 code though, so will have to work on matching with 2011 codes. Thanks Justin, will look into this