[repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

Hi all, I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I have logged this as a bug in rt.cpan.org [2]. Cheers, Cees [1]

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

On 3/15/05 11:54 PM, Cees Hek wrote: I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I have logged this as a bug in rt.cpan.org [2]. I think

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

On 3/15/05 11:54 PM, Cees Hek wrote: I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I have logged this as a bug in rt.cpan.org [2]. I

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

Hallo, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote: On 3/15/05 11:54 PM, Cees Hek wrote: I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

If there's nobody else, I don't mind being the maintainer, except I doubt that I'll be doing much more than maintenance (as opposed to active development). I should be able to respond in time in cases like these, though. Claus, the module is pretty much stable nowadays, right? --d Claus Färber