Hi Folks,
I think my post about this simple module, as part of yet another thread about
why DT doesn't have a Date::Parse equivalent parser, was missed. Anyways, I've
dumped some code into the DT CVS tree under modules/DateTime-Format-DateParse/.
It looks like SF's ViewCVS is lagging pretty far
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:46:24PM -0300, Flavio S. Glock wrote:
Dave has started DateTime, and I'm working on Pugs modules
DateTime::Span, DateTime::SpanSet and a new module called
DateTime::Recurrence, as well as the base modules Span, Recurrence,
and Set-Infinite. Everything is under the
On 7/23/05 3:35 AM, Rick Measham wrote:
If you read the code, you'll notice that I have a utc_rd_values method
as the math overload needs to be passed an object that 'can' call this
method.
Why not just override can() and delegate to DateTime proper?
-John
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Dave has started down a path for something which is/will be engineered
very differently from the p5 version of DateTime. I'm not saying this
is a bad thing, especially in the long run, I'm just trying to start a
discussion point on what the 'best' way
