Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-18 Thread Cees Hek
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:39:00 +0900, Daisuke Maki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I'm game unless Cees really wants to do it :) Cees? I've got lots on my plate already, so I don't mind passing on this. I'm happy enough now that the patches have been applied. Cheers, -- Cees Hek

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-17 Thread Cees Hek
On 16 Mar 2005 17:29:00 +0100, Claus Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote: I think the DateTime::Format::Pg is officially MIA. I filed a bug 4 months ago and have tried to contact the author many times. Sorry about that. I'm afraid all of

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-17 Thread John Siracusa
On 3/17/05 2:39 AM, Daisuke Maki wrote: If there's nobody else, I don't mind being the maintainer, except I doubt that I'll be doing much more than maintenance (as opposed to active development). I should be able to respond in time in cases like these, though. Claus, the module is pretty

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-17 Thread Daisuke Maki
It is supposed to be feature-complete, yes. What _can_ happen anytime is that the DateTime API changes in an incompatible way (very unlikely, although it has already happened) or that PostgreSQL adds some more formats. However, what really needs some work is the test suite. It does not

[repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-16 Thread Cees Hek
Hi all, I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I have logged this as a bug in rt.cpan.org [2]. Cheers, Cees [1]

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-16 Thread John Siracusa
On 3/15/05 11:54 PM, Cees Hek wrote: I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I have logged this as a bug in rt.cpan.org [2]. I think

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-16 Thread fglock
On 3/15/05 11:54 PM, Cees Hek wrote: I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I have logged this as a bug in rt.cpan.org [2]. I

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-16 Thread Claus Färber
Hallo, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote: On 3/15/05 11:54 PM, Cees Hek wrote: I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1] regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response. Just wondering if this slipped through the cracks. In the meantime, I

Re: [repost] two small fixes for DateTime::Format::Pg

2005-03-16 Thread Daisuke Maki
If there's nobody else, I don't mind being the maintainer, except I doubt that I'll be doing much more than maintenance (as opposed to active development). I should be able to respond in time in cases like these, though. Claus, the module is pretty much stable nowadays, right? --d Claus Färber