Hi, you did it again.
Kenichi
diff -ur Time-Local-1.16/t/Local.t Time-Local-1.16-patched/t/Local.t
--- Time-Local-1.16/t/Local.t 2007-01-24 11:59:24.0 +0900
+++ Time-Local-1.16-patched/t/Local.t 2007-01-25 11:34:23.31250 +0900
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
SKIP:
{
-skip 'this platform
Raf wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
>>On 1/24/07, Raf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>The code base I'm profiling is very big, monolithic and convoluted. I
>>>felt that level of granularity given by smallprof would probably give me
>>>more coverage - which I believe I need.
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Raf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The code base I'm profiling is very big, monolithic and convoluted. I
> > felt that level of granularity given by smallprof would probably give me
> > more coverage - which I believe I need.
>
> Usually tha
On 1/24/07, Raf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The code base I'm profiling is very big, monolithic and convoluted. I
felt that level of granularity given by smallprof would probably give me
more coverage - which I believe I need.
Usually that's the reason you use DProf -- it gives you the big
pict
More syntax reference. I've done a quick survey of interpretations
of $TZ. I'll also throw in a couple of formats not used in $TZ.
glibc tzset() interpretation of $TZ
---
Accepts a subset of POSIX format. Does not document (but does support)
the option to omit t
Hi Philip,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Raf wrote:
> > Apologies for the X-post. It seemed appropriate.
> >
> Mot off the top of my head, why are you using Apache::SmallProf and not
> Apache::Dprof -- the previous is usually too low level.
The code base I'm profiling is very
