DateTime::Display::Calendar or
DateTime::Display::Calendar::Text (vs. HTML, etc.)
?
-ben
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:46:59PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > Months ago I posted the beginings of a module that I called
> > DateTime::Format::Calendar. The discussion that fol
> Months ago I posted the beginings of a module that I called
> DateTime::Format::Calendar. The discussion that followed was that
> 'format' was the wrong namespace, but the conversation ended there.
> (http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.datetime/2488)
>
> I'm happy to continue working on this, and
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Rolsky) wrote:
> > Gregorian Calendar from Calendrical Calculations that requires 'DateTime'
> > http://www.python.org/doc/2.3/lib/module-calendar.html
>
> Sort of Gregorian, also a grab bag of random stuff, like monthcalendar,
> which retur
Just to be clear - I intended this to be humorous. I was not truly equating that
'stuff' to one true DateTime {TM}. :)
Cheers,
-J
--
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > Date/Time type announcement
> > http://www.python.org/doc/2.3/whatsnew/node18.html#SECTION000181
> They suck, we rule.
I forgot the 'for entertainment purposes only' disclaimer. :)
-J
--
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> 'DateTime' Object
> http://www.python.org/doc/2.3/lib/module-datetime.html
No leap seconds. Years 1 - only! (why?!). microsecond resolution.
> Gregorian Calendar from Calendrical Calculations that requires 'DateTime'
> http://www.python.org/doc
> Date/Time type announcement
> http://www.python.org/doc/2.3/whatsnew/node18.html#SECTION000181
>
> 'DateTime' Object
> http://www.python.org/doc/2.3/lib/module-datetime.html
>
> Gregorian Calendar from Calendrical Calculations that requires 'DateTime'
> http://www.python.org/doc/2