Re: FAQ cleanup

2003-06-06 Thread David Wheeler
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 08:28 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: I wrote a custom HTML converter because Pod::Html produces such awful HTML, and I wanted to customize some of the link handling. I also removed all the QUESTION bits and stuck them in docs/todo.pod in the repository, since they don't

Re: FAQ cleanup

2003-06-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, David Wheeler wrote: On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 08:28 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: I wrote a custom HTML converter because Pod::Html produces such awful HTML, and I wanted to customize some of the link handling. I also removed all the QUESTION bits and stuck them in

Re: FAQ cleanup

2003-06-06 Thread David Wheeler
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 08:25 AM, Dave Rolsky wrote: Tried Pod::Simple::HTML? We should all nicely ask Sean to get it finished, now that his new book is pretty well done. Yeah, I started palying with that, but it's not easily subclassed. In fact, subclassing it is near impossible. I think

Re: FAQ cleanup

2003-06-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, David Wheeler wrote: On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 08:25 AM, Dave Rolsky wrote: Tried Pod::Simple::HTML? We should all nicely ask Sean to get it finished, now that his new book is pretty well done. Yeah, I started palying with that, but it's not easily subclassed.

Re: FAQ cleanup

2003-06-06 Thread David Wheeler
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 08:38 AM, Dave Rolsky wrote: I think that subclassing is one of Sean's goals for the Pod::Simple classes. I say we bug him about it. ;-) Subclassing Pod::Simple is easy. Subclassing P::S::HTML is not. Yes, but AFAIK, P::S::HTML is just a placeholder, really, for the

FAQ cleanup

2003-06-04 Thread Dave Rolsky
I wrote a custom HTML converter because Pod::Html produces such awful HTML, and I wanted to customize some of the link handling. I also removed all the QUESTION bits and stuck them in docs/todo.pod in the repository, since they don't really add anything to the FAQ for most readers. -dave