I'm getting fed up with the damn sourceforge CVS instability and slowness.
What do people think of moving to Subversion, hosted either on my own box
(svn.urth.org) or maybe svn.perl.org if I can talk Ask and/or Robert into
it?
I'd convert the existing CVS repo, and since we don't have any
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote:
I'm getting fed up with the damn sourceforge CVS instability and slowness.
But at least it's backed up occasionaly...
What do people think of moving to Subversion, hosted either on my own box
(svn.urth.org) or maybe svn.perl.org if I can talk Ask
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote:
I'm getting fed up with the damn sourceforge CVS instability and slowness.
But at least it's backed up occasionaly...
What do people think of moving to Subversion, hosted either on my own box
Hmmm, I haven't used Subversion before, but as long as there's something
for OS X, it's fine... (And speaking of which:
http://www.pycs.net/bbum/2004/3/16/).
Too bad we can't just get a free copy of Perforce. I really enjoyed it
at my previous work.
Now I need to go read about svn.
--d
Dave
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Daisuke Maki wrote:
Too bad we can't just get a free copy of Perforce. I really enjoyed it
at my previous work.
We probably could, but I wouldn't use it. I prefer free software over
propietary when given the choice, and Subversion works quite well.
-dave
Just on a usability note, I'm in favor. I've been using svn on several
in-house projects over the last year or so, with no complaints -- well,
setting up the server end is somewhat involved, but once it's set up you
rarely have to visit it again.
The added functionality (proper handling of
