Hmm, a bit hard to read, your reply. I've added some more
quote chars to make it easier...
On 2007-05-19 19:55, Carsten Haese wrote:
>
>> quote="""
>> In general, I think that we shouldn't expose/impose such a
>> low-level interface for type mapping. These details should be
>> left to the module
Thanks for your input. I won't bother quoting all that, because it seems
to me that we actually have a lot of common ground.
You seem to be proposing that the user should write a converter
dispatcher function that returns a "binding hint" and an adapter
function. In my proposal, the dispatcher is
I have been following this on and off. I don't have much to add to the specific
problem, but I do have some general thoughts that may help.
I.
It seems to be a similar (not same, and even similar may be a stretch) problem
to the parameter formating problem 'solved' by .paramstyle which is one of
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:46 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> I have been following this on and off. I don't have much to add to the
> specific
> problem, but I do have some general thoughts that may help.
>
> I.
> It seems to be a similar (not same, and even similar may be a stretch) problem
> to th
Carsten Haese wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:46 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
>> I have been following this on and off. I don't have much to add to the
>> specific
>> problem, but I do have some general thoughts that may help.
>>
>> I.
>> It seems to be a similar (not same, and even similar may b
