Hi,
On 30/09/2020 23:07, Job Snijders via db-wg wrote:
> There is nothing left for RIPE to further improve here. RIPE-NONAUTH is
> slowly and steadily decreasing in size. AFRINIC resource holders have
> all the tools available to publish their routing intentions in either
> the AFRINIC IRR or
Hi,
On 21/01/2021 01:27, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote:
> 196.52.0.0/14 seems to have been revoked by afrinic:
>
>> $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net " --list-versions 196.52.0.0/14" | grep -i
> delete
>> % This object was deleted on 2021-01-16 05:56
>> $
>
> Regarding cleanup of route: objects for
Hi Ronald,
On 11/06/2021 11:24, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
> iana|ZZ|ipv4|192.175.48.0|256|20150501|reserved|ietf|iana
>
> In reality the block isn't reserved and it doesn't belong to IANA.
> It's a regular old (assigned) ARIN block.
I think it once *was* regular.
and then:
Hi Ronald,
less than a week ago, on this same list there was the conclusion that
these route objects would be removed.
real-soon-now, is my understanding.
That should resolve *this* issue.
But I think the holders could then create a similar route object in
AfriNIC...
Another thing that
On 12/05/2021 09:35, Edward Shryane wrote:
> The proposed cleanup is to only remove route(6) objects from RIPE-NONAUTH
> which are not registered in *any* region:
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2021-March/006876.html
>
> The cleanup will not delete the 62.61.192.0/18AS49902
Hi Ronald,
I think it was this:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2021-March/006876.html
and
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2021-March/006885.html
"If there is no objection from the DB-WG, I'd like to turn this proposal
into a Numbered Work Item."
ie: should be on the
Hi,
On 28/01/2021 13:53, denis walker via db-wg wrote:
> I think we should now deprecate this concept. LinkedIn is much more
> suited to keeping in touch with networking people. Comments
> appreciated...
I support the cleanup.
Frank
PS: what's LinkedIn ?
;-)
On 16/09/2021 09:06, Gert Doering via db-wg wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 02:59:04AM +0200, denis walker wrote:
>> The RIPE NCC effectively already provides
>> this referral service with RIPE GRS. It solves this problem 100% for
>> all RIR administered address space. Why do we need the NRO to
Hi all,
I'd like to suggest keeping the first listed one :
192.31.196.0/24 - AS112
and removing the 2nd (192.88.99.0/24) and the last (2011:4188::/48).
probably "reserved" is not the right status for 192.31.196.0/24
[rfc7535]
and
Hi,
my name is Frank Habicht, not having enable in RIPE region, but Eastern
Africa and active in AfriNIC etc...
Wanted to stay out of this, but to me this thread is turning sad and
"funny" at the same time...
On 29/07/2022 18:24, denis walker via db-wg wrote:
...
The legal team will have
10 matches
Mail list logo
