--- Begin Message ---
On 09/10/2017 18:22, denis walker via db-wg wrote:
C
-Hank
--- End Message ---
On 13/07/2018 18:40, Sandra Murphy via db-wg wrote:
While we are on the topic, anyone have an idea about Cisco and
66.187.208.0/20?
Thanks,
Hank
> So that’s the change I saw visible in the RIPE stat files at
> https://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/.
>
> Twitter has been announcing that space
On 15/04/2019 13:31, ripedenis--- via db-wg wrote:
I have recently encountered issues in this area as well. I would like
to see the standard "non-billing" users to not only be allowed for the
main resources but also for all sub-groups that appear under the LIR.
Currently, a user added as a
On 25/08/2019 19:16, Sander Steffann via db-wg wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at
https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/db/support/documentation/ripe-database-documentation/10-authorisation/10-7-protection-of-route-6-object-space
That page still documents that "the creation of a route object also
On 28/07/2019 05:19, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
I myself am an old school die hard UNIX guy from way back, but recently
I have been wanting to shared certain information relating to certain
WHOIS records with some other folks, some of whom are strictly and
only Windows users.
Are
19 Nov 2020 at 16:28, Hank Nussbacher via db-wg wrote:
Can a LIR account handle multi-tenancy?
What if you had a parent organization and a few sub-organizations and each has their own resources (ASN + inetnum) that they wish to manage independently (objects, RPKI, etc) without the oth
Can a LIR account handle multi-tenancy?
What if you had a parent organization and a few sub-organizations
and each has their own resources (ASN + inetnum) that they wish to
manage independently (objects, RPKI, etc) without the other
sub-organizations of
ds
Ed Shryane
RIPE NCC
On 17 Jun 2021, at 18:45, Hank
Nussbacher via db-wg wrote:
I am using https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/fulltextsearch
to do a full text search to
ease exposes this API directly via
https://rest.db.ripe.net/ and we will document it fully.
Also we plan to improve the query page in the coming months, we will look at
integrating full text search and allowing more results.
Regards
Ed Shryane
RIPE NCC
On 17 Jun 2021, at 18:45, Hank Nuss
On 06/05/2021 21:27, Massimo Candela via db-wg wrote:
Hi Hank,
On 06/05/2021 07:18, Hank Nussbacher via db-wg wrote:
What if you have a /16 as recorded by inetnum: as well as an RPKI
certificate for that /16 but within the /16 there is a /24 that has
been assigned to some other ASN? Can
On 05/05/2021 21:11, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote:
I'd like to ask for a clarification to section 4 specifically:
Both the address ranges of the signing certificate and of the
inetnum: MUST cover all prefixes in the geofeed file; and the address
range of the signing certificate
On 08/07/2021 00:29, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote:
Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote on 07/07/2021 15:05:
So 23456 is*not* excluded, but it can be if the DB-WG agrees.
just to be clearer: AS23456 should be included in the list of ASNs which
cannot be used as the origin.
Any objects which
On 07/07/2021 23:16, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
I have merely suggested that *existing* route objects that make
reference to bogon ASNs should be deleted from the data base, just
as is already and currently being done in the case of those route
objects that make reference to bogon IP
On 11/07/2021 10:32, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
Thanks Ronald, but that doesn't answer my question. I was hoping to see
route objects which reference *reserved* ASNs - not route objects for
unallocated ASNs.
In any event, thanks for the effort.
Regards,
Hank
In message
On 18/09/2021 12:21, Gert Doering via db-wg wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 05:39:14PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
I don't know who pays those IANA people or who thus controls their tasking
and priorities. All I know is that it isn't me.
I suspect it is me/us, after
On 18/09/2021 20:29, Hank Nussbacher via db-wg wrote:
On 18/09/2021 12:21, Gert Doering via db-wg wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 05:39:14PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette via
db-wg wrote:
I don't know who pays those IANA people or who thus controls their
tasking
and priorities. All I know
On 14/09/2021 22:56, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
In message <841e5d78-c466-c95b-a9cc-9f1ce2187...@geier.ne.tz>,
Frank Habicht wrote:
So, I tend to believe that I'm on the wrong list here, because my
question turns out to be:
can I trust whois.iana.org ?
The answer is: yes and
We are working on a PoC in regards to DR with AWS.
We are doing BYOIP and were asked to create an ROA record which I can
easily understand. But AWS also requests an X.509 certificate as per:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ec2-byoip.html
which needs to be added to a new
On 29/07/2022 03:55, Randy Bush via db-wg wrote:
the purpose has been for operational use since dirt was invented. the
geofeed: attribute points to data which operators, namely content
providers, need. maybe we do not need to make a bureaucratic mountain
out of a molehill.
randy
+1.
We
As a LIR we want to extract all records for which we are registered as
mnt-by. We tried:
https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query?searchtext=-i%20mnt-by%20ISOC-MNT
but it appears there is some limit at which point all results are
blocked for an undetermined time.
Also, we don't want to do
20 matches
Mail list logo
