On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:17:01 -0500, John Scoles
wrote:
> Of you could give it a try on 64 bit power solaris it you want to tug
> all of your hair out.
Would that be just as bad as True64?
I feel your pain however.
> H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:41:19 -0400, Ralph Doncaster
Of you could give it a try on 64 bit power solaris it you want to tug
all of your hair out.
H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:41:19 -0400, Ralph Doncaster
wrote:
On 11/27/09, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:21:05 -0400, Ralph Doncaster
wrote:
While you're a
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:41:19 -0400, Ralph Doncaster
wrote:
> On 11/27/09, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:21:05 -0400, Ralph Doncaster
> > wrote:
> > While you're at it, I'd like to see some more changes:
> > * make /usr/share/oracle not hardcoded but variable
>
> We're running
On 11/27/09, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:21:05 -0400, Ralph Doncaster
> wrote:
> While you're at it, I'd like to see some more changes:
> * make /usr/share/oracle not hardcoded but variable
We're running Oracle & perl on a few Unix boxes without a
/usr/share/oracle, so it seems
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:21:05 -0400, Ralph Doncaster
wrote:
> It seems I can't post attachments to the list, so here's the patch inline:
Looks sane to me, but I'm not the DBD::Oracle maintainer :)
While you're at it, I'd like to see some more changes:
* make /usr/share/oracle not hardcoded but v
It seems I can't post attachments to the list, so here's the patch inline:
--- ../DBD-Oracle-1.23-3oaWaD/Makefile.PL 2009-04-29 10:04:24.0
-0500
+++ Makefile.PL 2009-11-23 16:18:31.0 -0600
@@ -1055,14 +1055,19 @@
'proc/lib/proc.mk',
'proc16/lib/proc16.mk',
uses the appropriate Oracle makefile (32 or 64-bit). Original version
would use 64-bit Oracle makefile template with 32-bit perl causing
link stage to fail.
Tested with oracle 10.2.0.1 & perl:
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 9) configuration:
Platform:
osname=aix, osver
