Hi all,
I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository.
We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle.
# DESIGN
Currently this is a list of open issues and discussion points...
Topics can be removed once they're settled and the
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Hi all,
I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository.
We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle.
# DESIGN
Currently this is a list of open issues and discussion
Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it
deserves later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one
thing struck me immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like
DBD::ODBC's deviations from the DBI specification at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Martin J. Evans wrote:
Some of these might be really difficult to deal with in test code. Over
the years I've submitted many patches to tighten the DBI specification
but at the end of the day having maintained a DBD for quite a while
Am 02.07.2013 um 00:56 schrieb Martin J. Evans boh...@ntlworld.com:
Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it deserves
later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one thing struck me
immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like DBD::ODBC's