DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi all, I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository. We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle. # DESIGN Currently this is a list of open issues and discussion points... Topics can be removed once they're settled and the

Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi all, I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository. We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle. # DESIGN Currently this is a list of open issues and discussion

Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Martin J. Evans
Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it deserves later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one thing struck me immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like DBD::ODBC's deviations from the DBI specification at

Re: DBI::Test`s DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Martin J. Evans wrote: Some of these might be really difficult to deal with in test code. Over the years I've submitted many patches to tighten the DBI specification but at the end of the day having maintained a DBD for quite a while

Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 02.07.2013 um 00:56 schrieb Martin J. Evans boh...@ntlworld.com: Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it deserves later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one thing struck me immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like DBD::ODBC's