On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Dan Book wrote:
> I also prefer github but of course it's mainly up to what is easiest for the
> maintainers. Here is a script for migrating tickets if it's not what you
> already tried: https://metacpan.org/pod/RTx::ToGitHub
Actually, that is
I agree on getting of RT to Github. Basically, it's 2017 and github is
good at what it does.
On 11/14/2017 11:40 AM, Dan Book wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Michiel Beijen
> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:07 AM,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Michiel Beijen
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:07 AM, wrote:
>
> > Hi! As there are only few tickets on github, it would be easier to
> > disable creating new tickets on github and those few which are not
> >
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:07 AM, wrote:
> Hi! As there are only few tickets on github, it would be easier to
> disable creating new tickets on github and those few which are not
> resolved yet either move on RT or (if github allows it; which I believe
> yet) continue to exists.
On Tuesday 14 November 2017 10:56:58 Michiel Beijen wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:18 PM, wrote:
> > And I would suggest to disable issue tracker on github as primary bug
> > tracker (according to DBD::mysql documentation) is on RT and also
> > probably all