>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Urlwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:27 AM
>To: Neil Lunn; 'Timothy C. Phan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [Patch] RE: DBD-ODBC 0.28 for Cygwin
>
>
>Neil,
>
>To confirm: you don
It is now.
Jeff
>
> Can't the (intended) error be silenced by the test script?
>
> Tim.
>
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:24:58PM +1000, Neil Lunn wrote:
> > > I have this problem during 'make test'. Is it good/bad? Thanks
> > >
> > >t/02simple..ok 7/14DBD::ODBC::st fetchrow failed:
> > >
Neil,
To confirm: you don't need the readme.cygwin anymore?
Thanks,
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Lunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:41 PM
> To: 'Timothy C. Phan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Patch] RE: DBD-ODBC 0.28 for Cygwin
>
>
>
> >-Or
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:14:44PM -0400, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> > >
> > >Can't the (intended) error be silenced by the test script?
> >
> > Sorry, wrong word to use. How about a very lazy patch implementation.
> >
> > Actually Tim this *now* happens because RaiseError also sets PrintError.
>
> No
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Lunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:04 PM
> To: 'Tim Bunce'; Neil Lunn
> Cc: 'Timothy C. Phan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Urlwin
> Subject: RE: [Patch] RE: DBD-ODBC 0.28 for
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:58 PM
>To: Neil Lunn
>Cc: 'Timothy C. Phan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Urlwin
>Subject: Re: [Patch] RE: DBD-ODBC 0.28 for Cygwin
>
>
>Can't th
Can't the (intended) error be silenced by the test script?
Tim.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:24:58PM +1000, Neil Lunn wrote:
> > I have this problem during 'make test'. Is it good/bad? Thanks
> >
> >t/02simple..ok 7/14DBD::ODBC::st fetchrow failed:
> >[Microsoft][ODBC
> >Micro
> >soft A
> I have this problem during 'make test'. Is it good/bad? Thanks
>
>t/02simple..ok 7/14DBD::ODBC::st fetchrow failed:
>[Microsoft][ODBC
>Micro
>soft Access Driver]String data, right truncated on column number 2 (C)
>(SQL-0100
>4)(DBD: st_fetch/SQLFetch (long truncated) err=1) at
>t/02s
Hi Neil,
This is absolutely wonderful. Thank you very much.
I have this problem during 'make test'. Is it good/bad? Thanks
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
/usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/cy
gwin -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1 -e 'use Test::Harness qw(&runtests $verbose);
$verbo
se=0
