Re: [Dbix-class] VOTE: Relinquish firstcome rights to Peter Rabbitson

+1 ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk

Re: [Dbix-class] Decision time: which fork inherits the existing DBIx::Class namespace

More options are always better and the acrimony over a win-win situation is more telling than anything else that’s been said. ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN:

Re: [Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion

+1 for the fork. It's the only way to eat our cake and have it; affording different lines of development and culture without friction and strife. Since very few, if any, of you were here at the beginning, you probably don't know that this is essentially how DBIx::Class was born; as an indirect

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:07:04 -0400 David Golden wrote: > [...] >> * DBIx::Class (DBIC) – Peter's work provides a capstone, with only bug >> fixes thereafter >> * DBIx::Class2 (DBIC2) – new feature

Re: [Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: An actually concrete proposal w/bootstrap governance system

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:28 PM, John Stoffel wrote: > I'm just amused by all the verbiage flowing by, but no code, cries for > help with the code, etc. If it's all such a pain in the ass, just > free what's here and fork the project. Sheesh... that's the open > source way.

Re: [Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: An actually concrete proposal w/bootstrap governance system

This starts to feel like a corporate process that will be tuned out by what little community participates. Will more than two or three users engage with this? Will they follow the code closely enough to have a valid opinion? As far as stability goes, I'd like to see—actually, I'd like to insist

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

I did say MST RFC:MUST be respected. :P This is only here because of you. I was an early CDBI user and was there for the fights over its direction and saw you as the voice of reason, patience, and vision. Regardless of work done since, I see you as the owner. I was unaware there was as much of a

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

RIBASUSHI has given this codebase a tremendous amount of care, improvement, and deft effort. I am a user and evangelist of DBIC since it was the first fork of CDBI that started to solve so many problems. Peter has solved many problems since. My view: MST must be respected but I personally defer

Re: [Dbix-class] Proposed readonly patch for DBIx::Class

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Rob Kinyon rob.kin...@gmail.com wrote: It'd be nice if DBIC would convert the accessors to read-only. I think that's the point. In addition to the ++ for the idea I gave before I'll give a recent story: I needed this for a current project and instead ended up

Re: [Dbix-class] Proposed readonly patch for DBIx::Class

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ben Tilly bti...@gmail.com wrote: Often database schemas have tables that should not be changed at runtime in the application.  It would be convenient to be able to mark this fact in the class.  However to avoid accidents you wind up having to override methods

Re: [Dbix-class] deleting from a view

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Dave Howorth dhowo...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk wrote: I have a DBIC class made up using a UNION, something like this simplified example:  __PACKAGE__-table('nodes');  __PACKAGE__-result_source_instance-is_virtual(1);  

Re: [Dbix-class] Trying to contact DBIx::Class::Tree::NestedSet maintainer / module takeover

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote: does anybody know how to contact Ian Docherty, CPAN id ICYDEE? I'd like to contact him about patches to DBIx::Class::Tree::NestedSet, but his domain doesn't accept any emails, and alternative email addresses I found are on

Re: [Dbix-class] find_or_create and unique constraints

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Peter Rabbitson rabbit+d...@rabbit.us wrote: I want to make sure I am getting this right - are you proposing that we discuss drastically changing a stable API, potentially breaking DBIC for hundreds if not thousands of users, all for the sake of correctness? I

Re: [Dbix-class] DBIx::Class::Tree::Fast

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:50 AM, fREW Schmidt fri...@gmail.com wrote: I note you use the term 'ascendants' which is not a real word and so would be confusing. Is this the same as 'ancestors'? If so then it would be best to use ancestors since that is a word know by other people and it keeps it

[Dbix-class] utf8 + Loader generated/updated schema

I really like Loader but there are things that are impossible (I think) to do with it; specifically, using the UTF8Columns component (since it's per column). I found a nice article, in Japanese, on how to make your model base handle utf8 (in what I believe is the same fashion UTF8Columns