Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

Thanks for raising this David. I prefer the "Bazaar" over the "Cathedral". Cathedrals are fabulously impressive places of important historical interest, but they become cold and abandoned. If you need to do day-to-day business you go to the bazaar, where latest gadgets for every taste can be

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

Peter, Regardless of what else happens, I very much would look forward to you finishing up and shipping all the code changes you spent the last year working on. It sounds like you're almost done them, and I don't want all that effort to go to waste. I trust you that this work would provide

[Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

Hello, DBIC community. I apologize in advance for the length of this email, but I urge everyone that uses DBIC to read it fully as it relates to the future of this important module. For those who don't know me, I'm DAGOLDEN on CPAN and I've joined this list in my capacity as a PAUSE

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

On 10/03/2016 10:37 PM, David Golden wrote: In the ensuing discussion, Peter disclosed additional details about his plans for the future of DBIC Given the discussion generated way more interest than I anticipated, at this point I am pausing all activity ( both code and administrative

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

RIBASUSHI has given this codebase a tremendous amount of care, improvement, and deft effort. I am a user and evangelist of DBIC since it was the first fork of CDBI that started to solve so many problems. Peter has solved many problems since. My view: MST must be respected but I personally defer

[Dbix-class] Forcing might_have with dbicdump?

Hello I have two tables, list of all images for processing (say, table images ( id int primary key not null)) and separate list of unprocessed images (added recently, due to slow search in huge table of images - say, table images_queue (id int not null references images(id)) How can I force

Re: [Dbix-class] Forcing might_have with dbicdump?

Alex Povolotsky writes: > Hello > > I have two tables, list of all images for processing (say, table images > ( id int primary key not null)) and separate list of unprocessed images > (added recently, due to slow search in huge table of images - say, table > images_queue (id int

Re: [Dbix-class] Forcing might_have with dbicdump?

Ok, thank you, it's clear now On 03.10.2016 14:02, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: Alex Povolotsky writes: Hello I have two tables, list of all images for processing (say, table images ( id int primary key not null)) and separate list of unprocessed images (added recently,