Hi there,
After the upgrade, all sieve scripts that accounts had, are not shown in
squirrelmail's avelsieve.
I confirmed and they are on the db untouched.
Logging in with an account that had scripts, they are not shown, and if I
insert a new script, the existent script on the DB is
on Squirrelmail there's no info on the
logs.
Please give a hand on this!
Jorge,
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org]
On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: quinta-feira, 16 de Julho de 2009 22:44
To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist'
Subject: [Dbmail-dev
the AUTH hash, the XXX was me that have inserted them there.
Jorge,
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org]
On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: quinta-feira, 16 de Julho de 2009 22:54
To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist'
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev
One more, sorry for this massive emails:
I have some tables that are a bit different from the create_tables.mysql,
especially on the columns order, can this have any kind of impact?
Showing them:
My table:
CREATE TABLE `dbmail_envelope` (
`physmessage_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL default '0',
Paul, first of all that's for the help.
For pop3d, I have a crash, here you have a gdb trace, if this doesn't help
tell me and I'll try to get the 511 log.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb74a06d0 (LWP 28226)]
0xb7cd30c6 in
Paul,
Sent you to your private email the trace for this problem.
Does it help?
Jorge,
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org]
On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de Julho de 2009 15:27
To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist'
Subject: [Dbmail
For IMAPD, here you have a gdb trace, and a 511 log:
Gdb:
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0xb7bd9556 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7bd9556 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0xb7bdad78 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7e77064 in g_logv () from
Since now I'm 2.3.6 (git head),
IMAP has a different behavior now.
When I don't check or do something in the IMAP account, IMAPD disconnects
it!
In the bottom there's the dbmail+outlook message.
Thing is, how can I prevent this from happen and return to the, let's say,
normal (old) behavior?
Paul,
I need a help from you.
My db keeps growing more and more, in the version that I'm using, 2.3.2 has
a bug that isn't deleting the emails, but after this I added, helped by you,
after the script run this query:
DELETE dbmail_mimeparts.* FROM dbmail_mimeparts LEFT JOIN dbmail_partlists
You have to use the file log not syslog - as syslog will cut off the
messages.
Ah, I have it now :)
Jul 13 17:20:05 flecha dbmail-util[14628]: [0x9809b08] Error:[db]
db_query(+351): SQLException:
Jul 13 17:20:05 flecha dbmail-util[14628]: [0x9809b08] Error:[db]
db_query(+352): failed query
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] debian packages
Jorge, the zdb packages are on 'stable'.
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Paul,
Zdb isn't updated yet.
It's:
deb http://debian.nfgd.net/debian unstable main
correct?
Jorge,
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org
Paul,
Zdb isn't updated yet.
It's:
deb http://debian.nfgd.net/debian unstable main
correct?
Jorge,
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
Sent: sábado, 4 de Julho de 2009 22:28
To: DBMail mailinglist
Good work Paul!
Feedback from people who will use this 2.3.6 version are welcome.
Jorge,
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
Sent: domingo, 28 de Junho de 2009 16:20
To: DBMail mailinglist; DBMAIL
1-So for now I'm going to see a way to get this info from postfix,
whether grep the logs or something else.
2-the views are important, 'cause if the message was received by
postfix and not by dbmail, something eat it!
After wake up this morning I was thinking, the view's won't work, 'cause
On Freitag 19 Juni 2009 Jorge Bastos wrote:
That's why I think the best way is to make dbmail-lmtpd log this.
What do you say?
As long as we don't loose e-mails on the way from postfix to dbmail-
lmtpd, there's not much urge to implement this IMHO.
The only thing ATM that makes
And it's more easier for sure, I just don't know how to code it.
Why easier? less /var/log/mail is quicker than login to db and select
I guess?
Ok true but, not better when you go to search something, that's the
capabilities of having a DB and a flat file.
I'm with you on this feature,
received messages by lmtpd
Jorge Bastos wrote:
1-So for now I'm going to see a way to get this info from postfix,
whether grep the logs or something else.
2-the views are important, 'cause if the message was received by
postfix and not by dbmail, something eat it!
After wake up this morning
Hi,
John Paul,
I talked about this in the past, funny is that if I had this today it were
very handy, I had one client that needed this confirmation, of a certain
email was received by the server 'cause someone told him that had sent it
and it wasn't delivered.
The idea is to create a
by sieve! Grep the logs!
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi,
John Paul,
I talked about this in the past, funny is that if I had this today it
were very handy, I had one client that needed this confirmation, of a
certain email was received by the server cause someone told him
Paul J Stevens wrote:
delete from dmail_mimeparts
where id not in (select part_id from dbmail_partlists)
though this is of course a very slow query
Hmm. I thought we have put in that cleanup in the dbmail-util for trunk
(2.3.x) already?? dm_db.c:db_icheck_mimeparts(t/f)
I think
Jorge Bastos wrote:
I think there's something incomplete on that function 'cause when I
used the
git version when that was added, messages were not being completely
removed.
It might be that we are missing the partlists cleanup. If the parts
aren't being deleted
2009 14:20
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] New Idea
Jonathan Feally wrote:
Jorge Bastos wrote:
166319344 bytes RX, well not possible!!
I assumed that the values would start at 0. I have set them to 0 at
the
clientbase_t creation so give that a shot.
Jon
Paul,
The email below, I received it twice, my problem or you really sent it
twice?
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
Sent: domingo, 14 de Junho de 2009 20:03
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Paul?
John, why on dbmail-imapsession.c ?
Here is a preliminary patch.
It adds the dbmail_authlog table
Records the read and write byte counts as well.
Fixes pop3 client bailout process as well.
-Jon
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
John, why on dbmail-imapsession.c ?
Ops, sorry john, didn't saw the part on pop3.c, I'm still sleepy :-)
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Hi there Paul,
I'd like to ask you permission for something,
Can I write a patch (I'm going to try to do it since I'm not a big C coder),
to:
.. Add an extra field for the dbmail_users table, named last_ip. I
think this is a useful info, aswell the last_login is a very good info, and
A better approach to this would probably be a security log table.
user_idnr, service, login_time, logout_time, session_id,
session_status,
ip_address, tcp_port.
This essentially would require a new table, and some db_update calls in
the right places.
Cleaning of this table would be manual
Agreed, that'd be a more useful setup. Also consider marking failed
login attempts (though you might resort to syslog for non-matching
usernames). There have been requests for logging the above as well as
messages/bytes transferred stats and such in the past, I have no idea
where things
Add migration options to dbmail-util for legacy messageblks
Signed-off-by: Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl
---
Paul,
Looking at this, ALL the messages on old table messageblks, HAVE to be
migrated to the new mimeparts correct?
Will this impact something else?
Sorry the questions,
Recently we were discussing doing the moves based on a per user basis,
but with some installations of 1000's of users, this seems silly. The
end result is still going to be that you want to move all messages to
the new storage structure. It took about 1.5-2 hours to move 350K
physmessages on
Hum, I have to make some tests after 2.3.5 then, it's always better to
move
I meant, after 2.3.6
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Since we are now using libzdb, we really only need to provide each
program with the connection string. It would dictate what database
type,
host, user/pass, db name, etc. That would make our dbmail.conf real
simple with just a connection string in it. Everything else would be
read from
Hi Paul,
For some time on GIT, I have this on the first line:
flecha:/usr/local/src/postfix/git/dbmail# sh configure --with-sieve
--with-zdb=/usr
configure: loading cache /dev/null
/dev/null: line 1: configure:: command not found
This is dbmail's GNU configure script.
checking for a
Hi,
I think i've done a similar queston In the past.
I want to backup my DB, but I don't want emails, just users plus
mailbox's+alias etc.
So, I'll backup only:
Dbmail_acl
Dbmail_aliases
Dbmail_auto_notifications
Dbmail_auto_replies
Dbmail_mailboxes
Dbmail_pbsp
Dbmail_sievescripts
I'm not quite sure but I have an idea that is to leave sqlsocket blank like:
--
sqlsocket =
--
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Uwe Kiewel
Sent: terça-feira, 19 de Maio de 2009 10:09
To: DBMAIL Developers
That's it.
But a little bit strange. I have to provide a host name for a socket
connection?!
I remember that Paul said that that part still has some work to do :P
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
PS: Those not knowing Douglas Adams are forgiven.
Good to know that I'm forgiven :P
Who was he?
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
I have on both!
But with 2.3.2.
I'm waiting for 2.3.6 to be out to test if, I saw that Paul did some changes
related to that some while ago.
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Uwe Kiewel
Sent: quarta-feira, 6 de Maio de
Hi there,
A simple questions:
The QUOTA is calculated for every folders and every messages on them, or
just INBOX?
Jorge,
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
People Paul/Aaron,
Sorry about this off topic, allow me to ask a few things just for my
knowledge:
.. Who has FTTH?
.. How is the FTTH implementation going on your country?
.. In case someone already has, speeds? Download Upload? Prices? In
Euro if possible.
..
in an ubuntu
release (probably 9.10).
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Paul,
Does the configure script have something blocking the gmime version
to 2.0x?
On debian sid, I have the gmime 2.4x, and configure fails, saying
something
about gmime-2.0, can you confirm me this?
Details
What's your ZDB version?
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Uwe Kiewel
Sent: domingo, 3 de Maio de 2009 12:21
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master,
Try
Make clean
Autoreeconf -i
Configure blab la
Make
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Uwe Kiewel
Sent: sábado, 2 de Maio de 2009 19:47
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev]
Sorry,
Autoreconf -i
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: sábado, 2 de Maio de 2009 19:50
To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist'
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master,
updated. 222e7dd840fdee4a168760f4fc78a67dc2810907]
Jorge Bastos schrieb:
Sorry,
Autoreconf -i
No:
autoreconf -i
aclocal: couldn't open directory `m4': No such file or directory
[mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: sábado, 2 de Maio de 2009 20:57
To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist'
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master,
updated. 222e7dd840fdee4a168760f4fc78a67dc2810907]
Hum,
I don't know then :)
He'll explain when
Hi Paul,
I was testing and the error remains:
src/imapcommands.c |2 +-
src/maintenance.c |8 +-
src/pop3.c |7 +-
test/check_dbmail_mailbox.c |1 -
test/check_dbmail_message.c |2 +-
15 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
Paul,
Does the configure script have something blocking the gmime version to 2.0x?
On debian sid, I have the gmime 2.4x, and configure fails, saying something
about gmime-2.0, can you confirm me this?
Details:
flecha:/usr/local/src/postfix/git/dbmail# dpkg -l|grep -i gmime
rc
Ok,
Going to the configure file and change:
Gmime-2.0
To
Gmime-2.4
Makes it work.
But, how can you make this work for both situations?
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org]
On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: sábado, 2 de Maio de 2009 23:44
/postfix/git/dbmail'
make: *** [all] Error 2
flecha:/usr/local/src/postfix/git/dbmail#
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org]
On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: sábado, 2 de Maio de 2009 23:52
To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist'
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev
:S
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf
Of 7CREWZ
Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de Abril de 2009 11:01
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] 2ip Fiber Web Hosting at $199
sorry actually my brother did that
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:49 PM,
check http://www.mail-archive.com/dbmail@dbmail.org/msg15530.html
That's a kind of death we are all destined to :)
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Hi there Paul,
When 2.3.6 get out, will it be compatible with zdb 2.5?
From the changelog of zdb I think there's no problem.
PS: Update GIT if you can to try the lastest stuff!!
Jorge,
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
Hi there Paul,
When will we have news on GIT? :P
Jorge,
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman-new.icns.fastxs.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Test?
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman-new.icns.fastxs.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Test?
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Test :)
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Monnerie
Sent: terça-feira, 24 de Março de 2009 23:21
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Are we alive or am I dead?
On Dienstag 24 März 2009 Jonathan
Paul,
On last git the problem of lmtpd with memory leak/uncloses file descriptor
is already fixed?
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman-new.icns.fastxs.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
I think the best you can do for now is test sasl.
testsaslauthd -u test -p test
0: NO authentication failed
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of mediaslayer
Sent: domingo, 15 de Março de 2009 20:31
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
I've been seeing your messages Michael,
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Monnerie
Sent: quinta-feira, 12 de Março de 2009 13:55
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: [Dbmail] dbmail-dev list broken?
I got no
Maybe this question was made before but I don't remember the answer.
Paul or others, there's no tests on MySQL 5.1x yet, are they?
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
.
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Maybe this question was made before but I dont remember the answer.
Paul or others, theres no tests on MySQL 5.1x yet
When you reply to a message, you must change the To: field.
Mailing list was moved to another server or so and need's some tunning.
Paul sent an email to the list, didn't you saw it? I did at least.
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@mailman.fastxs.nl [mailto:dbmail-
That's not what I meant. I did not receive any single dbmail message,
as
the new host didn't have a PTR DNS record.
May was the dns's that weren't updated
The reply seems to work now.
Cool, it's fixed then.
___
DBmail mailing list
I seriously doubt this will 'kill' your system, even for very large
mailboxes. I use this routinely on mailboxes 5000 messages and it
only
causes a minor delay when I first select the mailbox. And that's using
a
very old 1.6GHz dual-xeon with 512mb ram.
Just for the record, I have in mmy
For sure it will.
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Bokhan Artem
Sent: sexta-feira, 27 de Fevereiro de 2009 21:26
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] heavy query with select inbox
...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Martin Furter
Sent: quinta-feira, 26 de Fevereiro de 2009 21:56
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Question about ETRN
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Paul,
Let me ask you something.
How
: [Dbmail-dev] LibGlib Issue
Yep. Both are regressions.
Jorge Bastos wrote:
About imapd, after this errors, it should terminated the connection
right?
--
flecha:/var/run# telnet flecha 143
Trying 192.168.1.221...
Connected to flecha.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK
Paul always let more people to participate on the project.
Just send a patch and he will include it.
I don't think he's not having time for the project, he may be 50% of his
time on it!
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf
Paul,
Help here on a thing, with the last git today on my testing server, I get
this after several errors on pop3d.
This seems to be a libglib problem, can you clarify me?
--
flecha:/var/run# telnet flecha 110
Trying 192.168.1.221...
Connected to flecha.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK
s
* BAD Invalid tag specified
w
* BAD Invalid tag specified
f
* BAD Invalid tag specified
a
* BYE [TRY RFC]
a
f
g
sdf
e
a
sdf
sdf
sdf
--
From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org]
On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: terça-feira, 24 de
Paul,
Debian SID now has libc6 2.9x.
Do you expect any problems from it?
Jorge,
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Do you expect any problems from it?
Should I? I havent seen libc6 related problems with dbmail, ever.
Great then.
Just to know Paul.
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Jorge Bastos wrote:
And if in a later version, maybe 3.x, DBMail had an integration with
openchange?
Never!
:) was just an idea Paul, don't get mad at me :P
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman
People,
I'd like to know, if someone has a bigger account than me.
The heaviest imap accounts are from me and 2 colleagues.
Mine has 3.99GB, and the next has 2.54GB.
Does anyone has a bigger one?
Just 'd like to know :)
PS: I don't have any performance problem or so, I'm just curious.
: Re: [Dbmail] Size of accounts
On Samstag 21 Februar 2009 Jorge Bastos wrote:
Does anyone has a bigger one?
I have about 10GB in a single account, with 141 mailboxes and 226493 e-
mails (average 46kb per mail).
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
And, frankly, Outlook does a very good job at what it does for email
and
calendaring with Exchange server.
Delivering a comprehensive alternative stack that works at least as
well, and can beat out Outlook on Windows for the business people every
organization can't get rid of remains an
Paul,
Now it was just LMTPD that died, the problem must be in LMTPD on
message
insert I believe.
Maybe IMAPD died because it was out of memory or other reason.
I confirm, it's LMTPD that is dying, when IMAPD dies it just because the
machine it's out of memory.
The last 3 dies were
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Configure with new libzdb 2.4
Jorge Bastos wrote:
What gives you that idea? The zdb debian packages install the libzdb
includes in /usr/include/zdb.
To build dbmail you don't need to specify --with-zdb since if you
configure dbmail --prefix=/usr.
If you use
Paul,
Wit zdb 2.4, you have a option:
--with-zdb
So I runned:
Configure --with-sieve --with-zdb=/usr/local/zdb (that's where the header
files are, installed using your debian packages)
It fails with:
checking for URL.h... no
checking for ResultSet.h... no
checking for PreparedStatement.h...
What gives you that idea? The zdb debian packages install the libzdb
includes in /usr/include/zdb.
To build dbmail you don't need to specify --with-zdb since if you
configure dbmail --prefix=/usr.
If you use a different prefix (i.e. /usr/local is standard when you
don't specify a --prefix)
Paul,
No hurry on it but, I'd like to start testing = 2.3.6 (git), but I want to
use libzdb from debian and not from source.
Can you post to -dev when you upload that?
Jorge,
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
libzdb 2.4 will be released today. I've been testing that code all
week.
Looking good. Packages will follow promptly.
No reason not to use the packages on debian.nfgd.net though.
I do use the libzdb packages from debian.nfdg.net.
I'll look at it later 2night.
Ok Paul,
As you said that zdb was going out today, I thinked you were going to upload
that.
libzdb 2.4 will be released today. I've been testing that code all
week.
Looking good. Packages will follow promptly.
No reason not to use the packages on debian.nfgd.net though.
I do use
Maybe can you update the fix foreign keys script in sql/mysql/ , so I
can see if this is the case ?
Show us the output of:
show create table dbmail_subscription;
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 ROW_FORMAT=FIXED
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Maybe can you update the fix foreign keys script in sql/mysql/ , so I
can see if this is the case ?
Show us the output of:
show create table dbmail_subscription
mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Segfault in the git
thanks, I will try that.
Is it possible to fix the fix foreign key' script ? I may not be the
only one with the issue...
Jorge Bastos wrote:
When you created the tables something went wrong or you created them
in MyISAM and convert
Hum didn't saw that,
But what's inside is correct:
---
SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0;
alter table dbmail_subscription drop foreign key user_id_fk;
alter table dbmail_subscription drop foreign key mailbox_id_fk;
alter table dbmail_subscription drop foreign key dbmail_subscription_ibfk_1;
alter table
)
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hum didn't saw that,
But what's inside is correct:
---
SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0;
alter table dbmail_subscription drop foreign key user_id_fk;
alter table dbmail_subscription drop foreign key mailbox_id_fk;
alter table dbmail_subscription drop foreign key
Paul, this may be related to my problem, can I provide you such
information?
Really? No Jorge, I seriously doubt the reading from the network has
anything to do with leaking filehandles.
Hum I thouth it could be the same :P
___
DBmail mailing
Paul,
Now it was just LMTPD that died, the problem must be in LMTPD on
message
insert I believe.
Maybe IMAPD died because it was out of memory or other reason.
And about this Paul, did you saw the emails? :P
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
-dev-
boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: segunda-feira, 9 de Fevereiro de 2009 17:09
To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] Help on debug an issue with IMAPD
Heh... and on second thought, this is likely due to a filedescriptor
leak, so the below
2.3.5 uses libzdb 2.2, so don't use libzdb 2.3 on it.
2.3.6 will use libzdb 2.3
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Artem Bokhan
Sent: quarta-feira, 11 de Fevereiro de 2009 15:23
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re:
That's hitting a system limit; su to dbmail and run ulimit -n to see
the current limit, probably 1024. Then try ulimit -n 4096 or so
before starting imapd ... or look at where your system sets those
limits
(eg. /etc/security/limits.conf on debian) and change it there (setting
is nofiles in
Heh... and on second thought, this is likely due to a filedescriptor
leak, so the below would just be treating the symptom, and only extend
the run-time, not solve it.
That. There's something not being closed in the tmpfile.
___
Dbmail-dev
Paul,
You're the package maintainer of libzdb for debian right?
When will you update the package for 2.3?
Jorge,
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
on debian
What are you talking about ?? It *is* up-to-date:
http://debian.nfgd.net/debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-
i386/mail/dbmail_2.3.5-1_i386.deb
And no! I'm not going to release 2.3 into debian/unstable. And I'm also
not going to package unreleased code.
Jorge Bastos
into debian/unstable when I release
dbmail-2.3.6, since 2.3.6 will depend on libzdb-2.3.
Jorge Bastos wrote:
I was talking about zdb.
Ok I understand your point on that :)
Jorge,
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org]
On
Behalf
Uwe Kiewel wrote:
Multi-part message source code in thunderbird:
==snip==
Subject: Test
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Return-Path: m...@kiewel-online.ch
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
/display
What revision are you on?
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Paul,
Theres a thread on the users list with the name Re: [Dbmail] Email
headers
not being ( correctly ) sent to evolution?
And I think I have a problem that may be related to it.
Without any changes on the email
401 - 500 of 1477 matches
Mail list logo
