Hi Arnaldo
| Well, I'd rather prefer a WARN_ON type, probably rate limiting the
| printks, so that we can receive reports that something is fishy but
| don't panic the machine.
I have implemented such a macro and have changed the patch to use it.
If it is acceptable, I would like to propose
On 11/15/06, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Arnaldo
| Well, I'd rather prefer a WARN_ON type, probably rate limiting the
| printks, so that we can receive reports that something is fishy but
| don't panic the machine.
I have implemented such a macro and have changed the patch to
On 11/16/06, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think something like WARN(), counterpart to BUG() is very much in demand :)
Agree. Should be trivial to implement and I had though of doing as
I've done WARN_ON(1) a number of times... Yet another thing to add to
my huge todo
3 matches
Mail list logo