Re: [dccp] Question on resetting nominal send time

Hi Eddie, Sorry for the delay in responding. | What follows is a first cut at a solution.  Any thoughts from others?? | | If t_ipi is used to schedule transmissions, then the following equation should | be applied each time the application is scheduled: | |     t_ipi := max(t_ipi,

Re: [dccp] Question on resetting nominal send time

Hi Ian, Sorry for the delay in responding. I agree that the t_ipi implementation sketched in RFC3448 Section 4.6 is incomplete with respect to slow applications, idle periods, and the like. :( What follows is a first cut at a solution. Any thoughts from others?? If t_ipi is used to

Re: [dccp] Question on resetting nominal send time

WHOOPSY! I wrote t_ipi when I meant t_nominal, or whatever symbol you choose for the time the next packet is allowed to be sent. t_ipi should not be changed; it depends on X_inst. Eddie Kohler wrote: If t_ipi is used to schedule transmissions, then the following equation should be applied

Re: [dccp] Question on resetting nominal send time

Ian, I can see what you are saying, and indeed this is an interesting problem area, in that it impacts what we understand as correct behaviour, but also impinges on what we may accept as accceptable implementation cost. I'll let others figure out their advice to you... Gorry Ian McDonald