Hi,
I'm almost finishing the initial release of the dccp plugin for
gstreamer and the integration patches of both, ccid3 and ccid4 (still
with basic changes from ccid3) according to discussed in the mail
list. Since gerrit changed the ccid3 module source code, I had to
update the ccid4 code too.
Well, I'm very closer to release the first version of dccp plugin for
gstreamer and I want to ask you something related to feature
negotiation, which gerrit recently submitted patches related to this
last week...
In the gstreamer plugin I want to provide a plugin property named
ccid, where the pro
2007/10/16, Mojtaba Hosseini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>I've recently started using DCCP as an alternative to our UDP-based
> implementation for point to point videoconferencing application. I had to
> struggle a bit to have it working. To save the next newbie the same trouble,
> I've writt
FYI, I started to use git-gui and it seems to be very helpful, but I'm
still using quilt/gquilt to finish the patches series for ccid3/ccid4
integration.
2007/9/20, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | You said that will define a specific frequency
> | (for instance, every week) that you will
2007/10/20, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Em Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 07:03:49PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 04:54:35PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu:
> > > I have a question/suggestion for DCCP/CCID field names, which have a
> > > tendency t
Hi,
using "ioctl (socket, FIONREAD, &readsize)" I can get how much is
available to read from the socket using TCP. Is there a equivalent
option for DCCP? I used this with DCCP and I got:
ioctl failed: invalid argument
Leandro.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
Em 23/10/07, Ian McDonald<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On 10/24/07, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just like UDP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Leandro Melo de Sales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> Signed-off-by: Ian McDo
Can you please revise to me the problem that you and the VLC guy had
while was implement DCCP support on VLC?
I'm implementing the dccp plugin for gstreamer and everything goes
very well, I can transmit an mp3 sound using ccid-2, but when I try to
use ccid-3, I can just send very little via send
Hi Gerrit,
based on conversations with you, Arnaldo and Ian, please consider
the following patches related to ccid-4 initial implementation and
code share with ccid-3. Also, please reset the ccid4 branch to have
the latest dccp branch code before apply these patches series. It
would be interesti
2007/10/31, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Leandro,
>
> following Arnaldo's reply, can you please you the suggested naming scheme (it
> is also
> already used in packet_history.c and loss_interval.c): I will be looking into
> merging
> the patches with the CCID3 set of patches, to reduce wo
2007/10/25, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/25/07, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > /* something like (but do have a look at the paraslash sources)
> > do {
> > wrote = send (socket, (const char *) buf + bytes_written,
> > count - bytes
Hi all,
I want to share a same socket-fd between two process using dccp.
The gstreamer plugin architecture uses a concept of sink and src (each
one named element), where sink send and src receive data. In this
case, one of then connects and inform the file descriptor to the
other. Then I thought
2007/11/1, Tommi Saviranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:24:44 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 02:22:49PM +0200, Tommi Saviranta escreveu:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 20:21:53 -0300, Leandro wrote:
> > > > - * net/dccp/ccids/ccid4.h
> > > >
2007/11/1, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The new ccid4 branch is now online. With regard to merging between ccid3/4,
> this will
> take some time.
Ok, no problem.
> I have a day job to do and there may be a few changes in the ccid3 code
> (will be announced on the list), but I'll let you
2007/11/1, Tommi Saviranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 21:30:35 -0300, Leandro wrote:
> > [CCID-4] Adapt CCID-4 according to the latest changes to CCID-3
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leandro Melo de Sales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Another hit from whitespace police. This isn't really abo
2007/11/1, Tommi Saviranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 21:32:10 -0300, Leandro wrote:
> > [CCID-3/4] Final adjustments to ccid3.c, ccid4.c and lib/tfrc_ccids.c
> >
> > According to the chosen strategy explained in [PATCH 15/25], some
> > defines become unnecessary. This patch rem
2007/11/1, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think we need to get back to deciding on a naming scheme for the structs.
> It is not
> your fault, but with the current scheme the names become extremely cryptic:
>
> | + * @tfrchcrx_last_counter - Tracks window counter (RFC 4342, 8.1)
> | + * @
Just forward a private e-mail with Tommi about his comments.
2007/11/1, Tommi Saviranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 21:30:24 -0300, Leandro wrote:
> > [CCID-3/4 lib] Initial lib for sharing common code between ccid-3/ccid-4
> >
> > The lib is called tfrc_ccids.o
>
> > Index: lea
Hi Gerrit,
2007/11/3, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've had a look at the recent set of patches, some more detailed comments
> below.
> Basically, I think it is too early to think of merging: it will constrain your
> work, at the moment there is really not much being shared, and to me it
2007/11/10, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | [CCID-3/4] Share ccid3_tx_state_name function via tfrc_ccids
>
> There is a build problem in declaring the following routines as shared:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID3_DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID4_DEBUG)
> static const char *tfrc_tx
2007/11/9, Tommi Saviranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:18:30 +, Gerrit Renker wrote:
> > Maybe the code would be clearer to read this way:
> >
> > hctx->ccid4hctx_t_ipi = scaled_div32(((u64)hctx->ccid4hctx_s) << 6,
> >hctx-
2007/11/9, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | | if (hctx->ccid4hctx_p > 0)
> | | - hctx->ccid4hctx_x_calc = tfrc_calc_x(hctx->ccid4hctx_s,
> | | + hctx->ccid4hctx_x_calc = tfrc_calc_x(NOM_PACKET_SIZE,
> | | hctx->ccid4hctx
2007/11/8, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | +config IP_DCCP_CCID4_DEBUG
> | + bool "CCID4 debugging messages"
> | + depends on IP_DCCP_CCID4
>
> | +# The TFRC Library: currently has CCID 3 and CCID 4 as customer
> | config IP_DCCP_TFRC_LIB
> | - depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3
2007/11/13, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Leandro:
> | 2007/11/8, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | > | +config IP_DCCP_CCID4_DEBUG
> | > | + bool "CCID4 debugging messages"
> | > | + depends on IP_DCCP_CCID4
> | >
> | > | +# The TFRC Library: currently has CCID
2007/11/8, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | @@ -76,16 +76,16 @@ static const char *ccid4_tx_state_name(e
> | #endif
> |
> | static void ccid4_hc_tx_set_state(struct sock *sk,
> | - enum ccid4_hc_tx_states state)
> | + enum tfrc_hc_
2007/11/10, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is to announce that the test tree on
> git://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/dccp_exp
> has now been updated with regard to removal of spinlocks (changelog as per
> previous mail).
>
> The CCID4 tree has also been updated to match the changes, change
2007/11/9, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Em Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 01:51:27PM +, Gerrit Renker escreveu:
> > | > using "ioctl (socket, FIONREAD, &readsize)" I can get how much is
> > | > available to read from the socket using TCP. Is there a equivalent
> > | > option for DCCP?
27 matches
Mail list logo