Thanks to all of you, I can write a small test that seems to be doing what I
want following Marc's suggestion. But I have a few questions (the test code is
attached)
* cell->set_dof_values(local_data, m_completely_distributed_solution);
Does set_dof_values set entries in
> If this is correct, do you see a way to circumvent the TRILINOS problem I am
> facing?
If you need entries i,j in the sparsity pattern and none of the
make_*_sparsity_pattern() function apply, you will need to add them
manually. This should be as simple as following the same logic you are
Hello Prof. Bangerth and others,
Thanks to all of you, I can write a small test that seems to be doing what
I want following Marc's suggestion. But I have a few questions (the test
code is attached)
- cell->set_dof_values(local_data, m_completely_distributed_solution);
Does set_dof_values
Thank you, Wolfgang. The explanation was clear as usual, I understood the
principle but overlooked the DoFTools class. This is now set.
Unfortunately, it seems that it does not solve my issue and I guess I
figured out why.
In brief, I am building an
interface matrix and an interface rhs in the
Hi Wolfgang,
Many thanks! The issue is resolved and the code is working.
Regards,
Lixing
On Saturday, January 9, 2021 at 4:07:27 AM UTC+8 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 1/8/21 12:15 PM, Lixing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > This way I can freely use bubble functions and only construct local K
> and F of
