Hi Jean-Paul, Yes, I set up the boundary check when taking care of the traction. It worked as expected using Physics::Transformations::nansons_formula(face_normal, F). To make a quick test, I did not linearize the load stiffness but just used the load at last Newton-Raphson step, so it is like a
On 8/4/21 8:16 AM, blais...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not know how to do this either. It would require that every manifold
has some sort of "center of mass" variable that would be used to define the
centroid of the manifold, but that would be some pretty heavy stuff to
refactor and I am not
Dear Wolfgang, Bruno and Peter,
Thank you for your helps. It was my fault for not reading the entire
function's documentation before asking the question here.
Best
Shahab
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:16:44 AM UTC-4 blais...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yeah I expected this...
> I would not know
Yeah I expected this...
I would not know how to do this either. It would require that every
manifold has some sort of "center of mass" variable that would be used to
define the centroid of the manifold, but that would be some pretty heavy
stuff to refactor and I am not sure it would lead to a
On 8/4/21 7:49 AM, Hermes Sampedro wrote:
I am working with step-29 and I was wondering what is the best way to import
the solution vectors (real, imaginary and intensity solutions) into Matlab. Is
it possible to export one point of the solution into a txt file? Or what would
be the easiest
On 8/4/21 6:57 AM, blais...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that not a bit of an ill-defined behavior for the triangulations? Shouldnt
the manifolds also translate themselves when the triangulation is translated?
This is a discussion we had at some point when we looked at the
GridTools::transform()
On 8/4/21 4:20 AM, SebG wrote:
a colleague and I have also worked with step-35 and we programmed a
parallelized version whose layout is similar to that of step-32. Currently,
the code is not suitable to be directly used as a tutorial, but, if you are
interested, we could refactor it and send
I must admit I don't know how to transform manifolds, let alone if it is
possible! Maybe someone else has an idea?
Separate if this, could you try out what I have described and see if it
resolves the problem. At least than, we have an idea what the cause is what
is at least a better stage we
Hello,
I am working with step-29 and I was wondering what is the best way to
import the solution vectors (real, imaginary and intensity solutions) into
Matlab. Is it possible to export one point of the solution into a txt file?
Or what would be the easiest way using Dealii for that?
Thank
Peter this is what I suspected :).
Is that not a bit of an ill-defined behavior for the triangulations?
Shouldnt the manifolds also translate themselves when the triangulation is
translated?
Clearly, it is possible to reset the manifold every time the triangulation
is moved, but this becomes a
Dear all,
a colleague and I have also worked with step-35 and we programmed a
parallelized version whose layout is similar to that of step-32. Currently,
the code is not suitable to be directly used as a tutorial, but, if you are
interested, we could refactor it and send it through github as a
Dear all,
I would like to address a problem related to the interpretation of the
results of a convergence test. I am performing a temporal convergence test
to test a solver for advection-diffusion problems. The test is based on a
manufactured solution on a unit square domain. The Peclet number
Hi all,
thanks for the many tips and suggestions, I really appreciate you spending
your time and effort helping me out!
I set up valgrind and kcachegrind, which I found exceptionally easy and can
get started now - perfect!
In case anyone reads this in the future, I had to use "mpirun -n 4
That brings a big simplification, at least when the aim is to just restart
a simulation and not to map the solution onto some other grid.
Thanks for all the help!
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 9:18:45 PM UTC+5:30 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 8/3/21 8:38 AM, vachan potluri wrote:
> >
> > I
Hi Shahab,
My best guess is that the attached manifold is not consistent to what you
need after the grid transformations. You have to be aware that the attached
manifold is used for generating new vertices (as it is needed during
AMR/load-balancing in regions that is newly owned by a rank).
Dear Richard,
I recently attend summer school
in which I learn about paraver but that is the visual tool for performance
from Barcelona SuperComputing center. But it comes with one more pre-
processor and a post-processor. Check the link below.
Hi Lucas,
I’m glad that you managed to solve this issue yourself.
> Given that the problem was a silly mistake on my end, ought I delete the
> forum post?
Given that you’ve explained what you did to fix the problem, this is useful
information for all. So we’ll leave the thread in place just
Hi Michael,
The one thing that stands out about the snippet of code that you shared is that
there is no check to
if (cell->face(face)->at_boundary() == true && )...
Do you still have something like that?
Otherwise, after a cursory glance, everything appears to be alright with this.
It mimics
To add to this great list of tools (which we should document on our Wiki),
there’s also the LIKWID performance monitoring and benchmarking suite which is
able to provide some very low-level metrics and tools to help benchmarking.
https://github.com/RRZE-HPC/likwid
19 matches
Mail list logo
