Re: [deal.II] Using mapping as manifold

2021-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 10/10/21 1:06 AM, Praveen C wrote: Should I try to combine MappingManifold and MappingFEField ? Have you tried to use MappingManifold? It is, in essence, the same as using first VectorTools::interpolate to convert your mapping function into a finite element function, and then using

Re: [deal.II] Mathematical clarification for step-44

2021-10-11 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Hi Arnold, When I compare the documentation to step-44 that you quote to the code itself, it would seem like there’s a typo there. The second term “-2 p \mathcal{I}” of the part that underlined should actually read “-2 p \mathcal{S}” since this really is the symmetric fourth order identity

Re: [deal.II] Implementing a fiber reinforcement in a biphasic model

2021-10-11 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Hi Matt, As a supplement what David already mentioned, I used the QP-based approach that you laid out for skeletal muscle modelling. Although the code-related implementation details are not documented in my dissertation , the Linear Elastic Active

Re: [deal.II] Implementing a fiber reinforcement in a biphasic model

2021-10-11 Thread Wells, David
Hi Matt, It is difficult to give a clear answer without some more information on how you want to compute with fibers and where the material model for the fibers is coming from. If you have a way to compute the fourth-order tensor directly then an approach like the one in the linked paper

Re: [deal.II] Docker and Eclipse

2021-10-11 Thread jack urombo
Managed to install from the latest git repo and it went perfectly well: MathW15Lnx:/home/jurombo/Downloads/dealii/build # make test Running quicktests... Test project /home/jurombo/Downloads/dealii/build/tests/quick_tests Start 1: step.debug Start 2: step.release Start 3:

Re: [deal.II] Best way and practices to implement new elements

2021-10-11 Thread Diego Magela
Dear Wolfgang, Thanks for pointing out these tutorials. I will take a look. Best regards, Diego Magela On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 6:44:55 PM UTC-3 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 10/8/21 2:19 PM, Diego Magela wrote: > > > > Yes, it is right. These are C^1 finite elements. > > These elements

Re: [deal.II] Dirichlet BC on block matrices

2021-10-11 Thread Мария Бронзова
Dear Wolfgang, I had indeed a gap in understanding of some points, it is solved now! I thank you a lot for your time and effort in trying to understand my problem and to help me out! With kind regards, Mariia среда, 6 октября 2021 г. в 03:02:52 UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth: > On 9/30/21 6:49