Dear all,
can I still use this implementation to output the material_ids together
with the updated DataPostprocessor class?
Thanks.
Best,
Tuanny
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 3:54:18 PM UTC+2, Pete Griffin wrote:
>
> Thank you Daniel for your response.
>
> I took a while since I was trying
f_index%7Csort:relevance/dealii/8fUwabkznaU/VlTERBo-GQAJ>
> and other post that reference "vertex_dof_index" for details on how to do
> it.
>
> I hope that this helps you solve your problem!
> Regards,
> Jean-Paul
>
>
> On Friday, August 18, 2017 at 10:05:36 A
Hi Wolfgang,
thank you for the answers!
>> Currently I am just using
>>
>> set_all_boundary_ids and set_manifold_id to identify the nodes around the
>> hole. Is there a way to specify the equivalent node (the node in the middle
>> related to the constrained nodes) in each hole and apply the b
Dear all,
I would like to simulate a compact tension test similar to the one shown
here [1].
Currently I am just using set_all_boundary_ids and set_manifold_id to
identify the nodes around the hole. Is there a way to specify the
equivalent node (the node in the middle related to the constrai
Dear Wolfgang,
our paper based on deal.II is online:
Phase-field modeling of fracture in variably saturated porous media.
T. Cajuhi, L. Sanavia, L. De Lorenzis.
Comput Mech (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1459-3
Thanks for adding to the list.
Best regards,
Tuanny
On Monday, July 17
le deal.II as well.
Thank you,
Tuanny
PS: Unloading the module atp helped to solve the problem I mentioned in the
previous message.
On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 6:41:15 PM UTC+2, Tuanny Cajuhi wrote:
>
> Hi Rene,
>
> I asked them and as soon as I get an update I will post it here.
Original message
From: Tuanny Cajuhi
Date: 6/3/2017 21:13 (GMT-05:00)
To: dealii@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [deal.II] Re: get errors when installing dealii on
openSUSE Leap 42.1 by using candi
Hi Rene,
your explanation helped me a lot!! :)) I was able to run up to this
Hi Rene,
your explanation helped me a lot!! :)) I was able to run up to this point:
[100%] Building CXX object
source/numerics/CMakeFiles/obj_numerics_release.dir/vector_tools_rhs.cc.o
Linking CXX shared library ../lib/libdeal_II.g.so
/usr/bin/ld.gold: error: cannot find -lAtpSigHandler
/usr/b
e that helps a bit,
Rene
Am Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2017 09:53:01 UTC-6 schrieb Tuanny Cajuhi:
Thanks a lot, Bruno.
I will keep trying.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
2017-06-01 11:37 GMT-04:00 Tuanny Cajuhi :
Thanks a lot, Bruno.
I will keep trying.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
> 2017-06-01 11:37 GMT-04:00 Tuanny Cajuhi :
> > You are right, thank you for the explanation. My code uses PetSc with
> MUMPS.
> > Just the output is done by Trilinos (the ide
You are right, thank you for the explanation. My code uses PetSc with
MUMPS. Just the output is done by Trilinos (the idea of joint_fe). In
summary, I need to add p4est.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
> 2017-06-01 11:17 GMT-04:00 Tuanny Cajuhi :
> > I think nu
It seems that the Cray has PetSc, I am not sure about MUMPS and I would
need it.
>
> Well you don't need numdiff and you can load bzip2 from a module
> right? My question is more do you just need to install p4est and deal
> and you can load modules for everything else or do you need to install
>
>
>
> 1) ask your admin to install deal for you
>
I asked but it seems to not an option at the moment...
2) use spack that has support for cray but I don't think anyone has
> ever tried to use spack to install deal on a cray.
>
I tried to install using spack as you suggested in the previous mes
I am on a cray (loaded module cray-mpich/7.5.1) and I don't know how to
explicitly call one thing or the other
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
> 2017-06-01 10:34 GMT-04:00 Tuanny Cajuhi :
> > I did not find any of them... :/
> That's very strange ho
I did not find any of them... :/
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
> This is the problem "mpif77: command not found" Does mpif77 exist? If
> not, does mpif90 exist? If yes try export F77=mpif90
>
> 2017-06-01 10:21 GMT-04:00 Tuanny Cajuhi :
> >
Hi Bruno,
thank you.
Are you using the same version of gfortran and gcc? Can you send the
> whole config.log. I need to see what's the environment that p4est is
> using.
>
/opt/gcc/6.2.0/bin/gfortran
/opt/gcc/6.2.0/bin/gcc
The log is attached. Thank you for the help!
--
The deal.II project i
...
and the 2 lines with 'error' in the config.log:
configure:4404: error: in
`/home/h/niitcaju/deal.ii-candi/tmp/build/p4est-2.0/FAST':
configure:4406: error: Fortran 77 compiler cannot create executables
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Tuanny Cajuhi wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
s
See `config.log' for more details
Best regards,
Tuanny
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
> Tuanny,
>
> 2017-06-01 3:53 GMT-04:00 Tuanny Cajuhi :
> > Failure with exit status: 1
> > Exit message: There was a problem building boost 1_63_0.
> > (attach
Dear all,
I am trying to install dealii on a cluster using
./candi.sh
--platform=./deal.II-toolchain/platforms/supported/linux_cluster.platform
and I get the same error as reported here:
*Building zlib 1.2.8 Compiler error reporting is too harsh for ./configure
(perhaps remove -Werror). **
19 matches
Mail list logo
