Great,
Thank you Dr. Bangerth, I will start to look from some of the book. Thank
you for all of your help.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
>
> > Yes, it is true that there are many lackings in the theory of finite
> > element. For the most part, I am self taught and
Hello Dr. Bangerth,
Thank you very much for your feedback. I do appreciate you (and everyone
else) for taking their time in answering the question.
Yes, it is true that there are many lackings in the theory of finite
element. For the most part, I am self taught and doing my best to learn the
ation. Now since I am
working on an electrostatic problem, I would not have these history
variables and thus, I am unable to utilize this weak form.
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 9:58:33 PM UTC-5, phillip mobley wrote:
>
> Hello Dr. Bangerth,
>
> Thank you stating this!
>
&
Hello Dr. Bangerth,
Thank you stating this!
I was able to go through the paper from Jean-Paul more thoroughly a few
times. I do have a few questions regarding the paper.
1) On equation 23, where do the subscripts ijkl come from? I understand
that subscripts ij are from equation 5. But I do
Hello Dr. Bangerth,
Thank you for your response and clearing up those questions. I am
continually going through steps 8, 20, and 21.
I ma currently exploring 2 directions, Jean-Paul linear elastic direction
and the Mixed-Laplace direction. From what I can tell, modeling the
anisotropic
st reporting what I
> perceive the trend in the literature to be (I’d be happy to have someone
> offer a different opinion that me on this). There is literally a mountain
> of literature dating back to the 1980’s on this topic, so I leave it up to
> you to read into this more.
>
&
Hello all,
This is a follow up discussion to the Jean-Paul answer to the question "Is
the approach for the electrostatic Bi-linear form correct?". The question
(and answer) can be found at the following link:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/dealii/i8P4JTwm7kQ
In short, I am modeling
Hello all,
I am currently creating an electrostatic solver where the simulation will
need to solve a problem with multiple boundaries.
I will be using a simulation of a parallel plate capacitor as an example of
what I am trying to do. In this simulation, I will need to solve for the
voltage
On 10/08/2018 10:36 AM, phillip mobley wrote:
> >
> > Would this be the correct logic for implementing the
> > get_function_gradient function? Or do I need to run the
> > get_function_gradient function as I am solving for the scalar voltage
> field?
&
. grad[[V]]
>
> So, in summary, the strong form of the governing equation to be
> implemented is (10), with the solution for V leading to the electric field
> by (8) and subsequently the electric displacement by (3). The continuity
> conditions (4,5) are satisfied if the solution for V
e solution for V leading to the electric field
> by (8) and subsequently the electric displacement by (3). The continuity
> conditions (4,5) are satisfied if the solution for V is continuous.
>
> Does this make sense, and does it help clear up things?
>
> Best regards,
> Jean-Pau
Hello Wolfgang,
Thank you for your reply. What you described above is the first approach
that I took. There are some differences but overall, it is the same thing.
I am not familiar with the form:
div E - Delta V = 0
but, I was able to figure out how you came this. Instead, I kept the
As another side note, in this version of the simulation, the charge density
(p or rho) will always be zero. Hence, the reason it drops off in my
equations.
On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 11:19:08 PM UTC-4, phillip mobley wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am unable to edit my original p
Hello all,
I am unable to edit my original post. So I am creating a new post with the
equations. I think that I solved issue with the equations not being
displayed. The original posting will be deleted.
I have recently started to learn how to use Deal.II. I have been spending
some going
Hello all,
I am checking my post on a tablet. The equations that I created are not
appearing on my device and instead appear as a ?. It could be that the browser
I am using does not support the equations. For the first person who answers,
please let me know if you can see the equations clearly
Hello all,
I have recently started to learn how to use Deal.II. I have been spending
some going through some of the video tutorials for Deal.II, going through
the coding tutorials, and watching some of the videos from the University
of Michigan related to Finite Element Analysis. I have
On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 10:20:12 PM UTC-4, phillip mobley wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am getting an odd error where the program is not able to find a
> particular reference to one of the packages.
>
> The error is listed below:
>
&g
Doing it the normal way with cmake, step 6 is able to run properly without
any errors
On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 9:16:32 AM UTC-4, Bruno Turcksin wrote:
>
> Can you run step-6 if you use cmake, i.e., if you use the recommended way?
>
> 2018-05-04 9:06 GMT-04:00 phillip mob
Yes, I do get the same error for step-6.
Also, I tried the above fixes and I am still receiving the error
On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 9:02:05 AM UTC-4, Bruno Turcksin wrote:
>
> 2018-05-04 8:53 GMT-04:00 phillip mobley <phillip...@gmail.com
> >:
>
>> I as able to compile
to compile an application. You need to use the same.
>
> Best
>
> Bruno
>
> On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 10:20:12 PM UTC-4, phillip mobley wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am getting an odd error where the program is not able to find a
&g
Hello all,
I am getting an odd error where the program is not able to find a
particular reference to one of the packages.
The error is listed below:
./Debug/main.cpp.o:(.rodata._ZTVN6dealii7DataOutILi2ENS_10DoFHandlerILi2ELi2E[_ZTVN6dealii7DataOutILi2ENS_10DoFHandlerILi2ELi2E]+0x28):
, phillip mobley wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I received an update from github where some developers were working on
> integrating GMSH with dealii. As I am using GMSH in my application, I was
> wondering what is the status of this feature and what is the projected
> direction of
Hello all,
I received an update from github where some developers were working on
integrating GMSH with dealii. As I am using GMSH in my application, I was
wondering what is the status of this feature and what is the projected
direction of what this feature can do?
This is of interest to me
Hello all,
after going dark for sometime, I ma slowly coming back to dealii! I have
made quite a bit of progress with this simulator that I am creating. The UI
is now fully fleshed out. There was this crazy dev cycle where it took a
long time (that and I was learning a new C++ library)
I am
; On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 4:57 PM, phillip mobley
> <phillip...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have been looking into creating 2D geometry and meshing for sometime.
> I
> > was reading the FAQ and came across this little paragraph:
> &g
25 matches
Mail list logo
