Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

OK now I am finally all set. For other people who had this issue I needed to run CMAKE with the following flags cmake -/"install dir" /"location of deal.ii source", -DDEAL_II_WITH_MPI=ON -DDEAL_II_TRILINOS_WITH_SACADO=ON, -DTRILINOS_DIR=/usr/ without the sacado flag it does not work

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

So I thought I was in good shape. I had cmake run with the proper flags and everything and built deal.ii But. I tried to build step-33 and got the following -- Using the deal.II-9.3.1 installation found at /usr/local/deal.II -- Include macro

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

Hi Matthew, Great, I’m glad to hear that! > So my last question is what is the difference between a flag being ON vs set > up with external dependencies ( which is what trilinos is set at now) When you set one of these flags to “ON”, you are demanding from CMake that this option be enabled

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

Thanks that worked! I needed to install the full trilinos-all-dev to get all the packages. I also needed to install libptscotch-dev. So my last question is what is the difference between a flag being ON vs set up with external dependencies ( which is what trilinos is set at now) Will I be

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

Hi again Matthew, I’ve also found this build log for the Debian deal.II apt package https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=deal.ii=all=9.2.0-3=1606990185=0 and you can see that in amongst all of the

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

Hi Matthew, If you look at either log file, then you’ll see that Trilinos was in fact not detected for some reason. > DEAL_II_WITH_TRILINOS = OFF I’m no longer experienced in building deal.II using apt packages, but it might be that you have to install the entire trilinos-dev to get all of

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

So I tried running cmake again to get trilinos picked up. It does not seem to be detected. I even try supplying the directory with cmake -/usr/local ./ -DTRILINOS_DIR=/usr/include/trilinos But it still does not get detected. Should I build trilinos from source as well? I attached another

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

Hi Thanks for the prompt reply. Yes I built deal.II from source but libtrilinos-sacado-dev was installed via the debian package and apt (log files attached). I have all the headers in my /usr/include/trilinos directory. Just skimming the summary file it appears that deal.II did not detect

Re: [deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

Hi Matthew, I don’t quite understand exactly how you installed deal.II and Trilinos. Perhaps you can provide some more explicit details so that we can help you out. * Is Trilinos installed using the apt package, and deal.II installed from source? If you built deal.II from source, may you

[deal.II] New location for sacado.hpp

Hi all, I am a bit confused on step-33 which uses the differentiation of sacado. I installed the latest version. 9.3 which has trilinios in it, and therefore sacado. Browsing that directory I see other header files for the package but not sacado.hpp The tutorial has the line #include Was this