Re: [deal.II] problems with installation ; Unknown CMake command "DEAL_II_ADD_LIBRARY"

2016-07-03 Thread Timo Heister
Pablo, can you try putting the source directory path at the end of the cmake command as in cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/pablo/dealii -DOPENCASCADE_DIR=/usr/local/include/oce /home/pablo/dealii/source On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Pablo Perez del Castillo

Re: [deal.II] About MPI vectors, ghosted vectors

2016-07-03 Thread RAJAT ARORA
Hi Ehsan, On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 3:28:40 PM UTC-4, Ehsan Esfahani wrote: > > Dear users, > > I'm asking my question here because I think it's somehow related to this > post, and I don't think it would be necessary to open a new topic. Could > you please tell me what are differences

[deal.II] Restoring Gauss Point History during checkpoint/restart

2016-07-03 Thread RAJAT ARORA
Hello all, This is related to checkpoint/restart using the parallel distributed solution transfer class. I am able to read the parallel vectors during the restart following the example of aspect here

[deal.II] Error durind checkpoint / restart using parallel distributed solution transfer

2016-07-03 Thread RAJAT ARORA
Hello all, I am trying to use the checkpoint / restart code with the help of the example given in the documentation here I am getting a long error while saving a parallel vector and parallel

[deal.II] Re: Error durind checkpoint / restart using parallel distributed solution transfer

2016-07-03 Thread RAJAT ARORA
Hello, This is because of the vector locally_owned_x. As per the documentation, during the serialization, the vector should be ghosted. If I make the change, the code works fine. On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 2:52:57 PM UTC-4, RAJAT ARORA wrote: > > Hello all, > > I am trying to use the

[deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

2016-07-03 Thread Ehsan Esfahani
Dear All, Greetings. I changed step-25 (minor changes) in order to solve my problem. Now I want to change this code for parallel computation based on the method mentioned in step-40. I got several errors and solved them one by one but the following error: > > *Number of active cells:

[deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

2016-07-03 Thread Ehsan Esfahani
Dear All, Greetings. I changed step-25 (minor changes) in order to solve my problem. Now I want to change this code for parallel computation based on the method mentioned in step-40. I got several errors and solved them one by one but the following error: > > *Number of active cells:

Re: [deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

2016-07-03 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 07/03/2016 03:50 PM, Ehsan Esfahani wrote: Dear All, Greetings. I changed step-25 (minor changes) in order to solve my problem. Now I want to change this code for parallel computation based on the method mentioned in step-40. I got several errors and solved them one by one but the following

Re: [deal.II] Re: Deal.II does not pass quick tests after installation

2016-07-03 Thread Thien Binh Nguyen
Dear Mr. Wells, Thank you very much for your prompt response, and I am also sorry for my late reply! When ldd either to libdeal_II.so or libdeal_II.g.so, I received the following messages [image: Hình ảnh nội tuyến 1] As you noticed, I compiled Deal.II with root privilege. I was trying to