Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

Hi, Moreover I have 2 more problems. First: previously when I installed deal-ii without MPI, Trilinos and P4EST options and addresse deall-ii to be installed ins a specific directory with -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX= /home/General_for_All_Users/deal_II_install_dir option, it was installed in the

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

Ehsan. Yes, but that is not what you have done. ;-) Look at the configure script in your first email again calmly and *very carefully* and then look at my reply calmly and *very carefully*. In the configure script you sent us, you are missing a D on two lines, which I am guessing is stopping

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

Dear Toby, Thanks for your reply. I deleted folder of my previous deal ii installation and installed it again and now I faced two other problems. Can you please help me solve them: First: previously when I installed deal-ii without MPI, Trilinos and P4EST options and addresse deall-ii to be

[deal.II] Re: PETScWrappers::SparseDirectMUMPS for symmetry system matrix and factorization resue

So why is it not 162x162? step-17 claims to solve same problem as step-8. If one produces symmetry matrix and the other does not or both do not -- this is suspicious. Anyway, I recommend you creating an issue on github and put short description with the link to this thread. People who created

Re: [deal.II] Re: PETScWrappers::SparseDirectMUMPS for symmetry system matrix and factorization resue

On 07/27/2016 01:43 PM, Alexander wrote: step-17 claims to solve same problem as step-8. If one produces symmetry matrix and the other does not or both do not -- this is suspicious. The reason why the matrix in step-17 is not symmetric is actually explained in the code: // The last

Re: [deal.II] Re: PETScWrappers::SparseDirectMUMPS for symmetry system matrix and factorization resue

Hi Wolfgang, Thank you for the explanation. Then everything make sense. Best, Shanglong 在 2016年7月27日星期三 UTC-4下午6:13:16，bangerth写道： > > On 07/27/2016 01:43 PM, Alexander wrote: > > > > step-17 claims to solve same problem as step-8. If one produces symmetry > > matrix and the other does not

Re: [deal.II] Re: Memory usage using MPI/PETSc on single processor

Pete, I saw it. I am just busy :-) I will try to take another look later. Best, Bruno 2016-07-27 9:37 GMT-04:00 Pete Griffin : > Bruno, I posted a reply to your comment. but not within your comment but at > top of page. If you did not receive an indication of reply

Re: [deal.II] Issue on Windows x64 Debug linkage

In my system, deal_II.lib is about 400MB and deal_II.g.lib is almost 2GB. Maybe the issue is somehow related to these reports: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/995447/linker-is-hanging-while-linking-some-project-in-debug-x64-configuration