What do you mean with "What I want to do with the matrix afterwards"? And I
am not sure if I need it element-by-element, I just would like to implement
a cheaper update method than the full recalculation.
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2018 22:21:00 UTC+1 schrieb Wolfgang Bangerth:
>
> On 11/27/2018
Maxi,
What do you mean with "What I want to do with the matrix afterwards"? And I
> am not sure if I need it element-by-element, I just would like to implement
> a cheaper update method than the full recalculation.
>
You can always obtain a matrix representation of a linear operator by
Hi,
I'm fine tuning a simulation in the frequency domain (similar to
https://github.com/dealii/dealii/pull/6747). Because it is in the frequency
domain I can parallelize:
1. Using MPI
2. Running several simulations in parallel for different independent
frequency ranges.
3. A
For the implementation of the Quasi-Newton-method according to Schubert,
which is defined as
C_1 = C_0 - sum(u_i u_i^T(C_0p_j - y/t)(p_i^T/(p_i^Tp_i)))
with p_i the vector p with all elements set to zero where column vector i
of matrix C_0 has zero-value entries,
I need the position of zero-
On 12/4/18 6:19 AM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group wrote:
> For the implementation of the Quasi-Newton-method according to Schubert,
> which
> is defined as
>
> C_1 = C_0 - sum(u_i u_i^T(C_0p_j - y/t)(p_i^T/(p_i^Tp_i)))
>
> with p_i the vector p with all elements set to zero where column
Maxi,
On Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 3:48:41 AM UTC-5, Maxi Miller wrote:
>
> What do you mean with "What I want to do with the matrix afterwards"? And
> I am not sure if I need it element-by-element, I just would like to
> implement a cheaper update method than the full recalculation.
>
If
Bruno,
I created a corresponding issue in the GitHub repository at
https://github.com/dealii/dealii/issues/7501.
Best,
Daniel
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this
On 12/4/18 4:30 AM, Daniel Garcia-Sanchez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fine tuning a simulation in the frequency domain (similar to
> https://github.com/dealii/dealii/pull/6747). Because it is in the frequency
> domain I can parallelize:
>
> 1. Using MPI
> 2. Running several simulations in parallel
Hi,
I think that I found the explanation/solution. But I would be happy if
somebody with experience with OpenMPI and Slurm could comment on this!
On Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 12:30:15 PM UTC+1, Daniel Garcia-Sanchez
wrote:
>
> But it is striking that If I run 16 MPI jobs of one process per
Hello Daniel
In this case, the duplicates are because I have sym links to the same
libraries, and cmake is adding both paths to the linker. This should not cause
any problem. I have fixed it by not using the symlinked libraries, so it is
fine now.
Thank you
praveen
> On 04-Dec-2018, at 5:02
On 12/4/18 7:58 AM, Daniel Garcia-Sanchez wrote:
>
> Although if I run in the same 16 core machine:
>
> * 16 instances of ./executable
> * 16 instances of mpirun -n 1 ./executable
>
> Then the results are different. I think that the reason is that mpirun
> (OpenMPI) will bound all the
> There shouldn't be a difference between running a job via
>./executable
> and
>mpirun -n 1 ./executable.
>
> Are your timing results reproducible?
>
>
>
My timing results are reproducible. As expected, there is no difference
between ./executable and mpirun -n 1 ./executable.
Hi all,
I have a hyperelastic code similar to Step-44. I am able to compute the
Cauchy stress \sigma at the quadrature points. Based on this, how do I
further compute the divergence (w.r.t. current configuration) of Cauchy
stress as a vector?
The following is my thought:
1. Define the stress
Hi
I'm looking for people passioned in programming and Science generally geeks
I am after initial conversation with Investor
Profile of my company is Tooling, Prototyping, 3d Printing and HPC in the
future military equipment production
Initial plan is to locate my company in Jelenia Góra in
Yes, I am interested.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018, 03:53 BornToCreate wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm looking for people passioned in programming and Science generally geeks
>
> I am after initial conversation with Investor
>
> Profile of my company is Tooling, Prototyping, 3d Printing and HPC in the
> future
Dear Chinedu,
Please be aware that the original post was deleted because it was
unsolicited spam.
Best,
Jean-Paul
On Wednesday, December 5, 2018 at 8:05:02 AM UTC+1, Chinedu Nwaigwe wrote:
>
> Yes, I am interested.
>
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo
