Re: [deal.II] Re: Adding an independent DoF to a Trilinos system

On 03/22/2018 03:22 PM, Ben Shields wrote: I did some digging into the Trilinos reinit_matrix, and I've found that all of my lost time is coming from the operation   graph->FillComplete(input_col_map, input_row_map) This step is accounting for as much as 20 seconds per call for a 1x200,000 m

[deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #25

Hello everyone! This is deal.II newsletter #25. It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the deal.II finite element library. ## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features: #6103: CMake: Do not require a special name for TRACK="Continuous" (prop

Re: [deal.II] Re: use of "meshworker" for FESystem

Thanks for the attetion. I overcame this problem, though I don’t recognize what was solution now. It turns out to be possible… Thank you for your time Jaekwang On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Daniel Arndt < daniel.ar...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote: > Jaekwang, > > do you have a minimal comp

Re: [deal.II] Are shell elements available in deal.II?

Hi I’ve hesitated to add this link as it predates many of the features in deal.II that would have made the implementation a lot more elegant and simple. Nevertheless have a look at https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/5552 It’s a fully nonlinear shell t

Re: [deal.II] Are shell elements available in deal.II?

On 03/25/2018 11:44 AM, Yuxiang Wang wrote: My current need for shell element is for solid mechanics problem (Mindlin-Reissner plates). A simple example could be that a thick square plate, with all its edges fixed, under a force loading at the center. The dimensions of the plate are around 10