Re: [deal.II] Modelling Anistropic materials for electrostatic simulations

2018-11-08 Thread phillip mobley
Hello Dr. Bangerth, Thank you very much for your feedback. I do appreciate you (and everyone else) for taking their time in answering the question. Yes, it is true that there are many lackings in the theory of finite element. For the most part, I am self taught and doing my best to learn the

Re: [deal.II] Modelling Anistropic materials for electrostatic simulations

2018-11-08 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
Philip, > I was able to go through the paper from Jean-Paul more thoroughly a few > times. I do have a few questions regarding the paper. So many questions :-) Most of your questions -- like why the stress-strain tensor in elasticity has four indices, and whether or not to use mixed

[deal.II] Re: Discrete Galekin with periodic boundary condition

2018-11-08 Thread Daniel Arndt
Jaekwang, DoFTools::make_hanging_node_constraints (dof_handler, constraints); > > DoFTools::make_periodicity_constraints(dof_handler,6,5 //Boundary ID 6 is > outlet and 5 is inlet > >,0, > > constraints > >

[deal.II] Re: Discrete Galekin with periodic boundary condition

2018-11-08 Thread Jaekwang Kim
Thanks, for the reply.. Hi am using following function to construct periodicity when I set up dof DoFTools::make_hanging_node_constraints (dof_handler, constraints); DoFTools::make_periodicity_constraints(dof_handler,6,5 //Boundary ID 6 is outlet and 5 is inlet

Re: [deal.II] Discrete Galekin with periodic boundary condition

2018-11-08 Thread Jaekwang Kim
Thanks for the reply! I will take a look Jaekwang On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 10:05:10 PM UTC-6, Praveen C wrote: > > You have to do some extra work to use periodic bc with MeshWorker. I have > a Euler DG code here which can do that > >

Re: [deal.II] Re: Installation of deal.II with CUDA

2018-11-08 Thread Chih-Che Chueh
Bruno > See the attached file for your reference and checking. > The testsuite only runs for CUDA 8.0 and 9.0 can you try one of this > version of CUDA and see if that helps? > When I am using cuda/8.0.61, I get the following error after I do cmake. [chueh5851a@glogin1 build]$ module list

Re: [deal.II] Re: Installation of deal.II with CUDA

2018-11-08 Thread Bruno Turcksin
Chih-Che Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 à 09:09, Chih-Che Chueh a écrit : > See the attached file for your reference and checking. The testsuite only runs for CUDA 8.0 and 9.0 can you try one of this version of CUDA and see if that helps? Best, Bruno -- The deal.II project is located at

Re: [deal.II] Re: Installation of deal.II with CUDA

2018-11-08 Thread Chih-Che Chueh
Bruno, > make[1]: *** > [source/matrix_free/CMakeFiles/obj_matrix_free_debug.dir/all] Error 2 > > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs > It looks like the first error is before what you showed. Also can you > post the detailed.log file. > See the attached file for your reference and

Re: [deal.II] Re: Installation of deal.II with CUDA

2018-11-08 Thread Bruno Turcksin
Chih-Che Le mer. 7 nov. 2018 à 18:40, Chih-Che Chueh a écrit : > [ 65%] Building CXX object > source/meshworker/CMakeFiles/obj_meshworker_debug.dir/mesh_worker_vector_selector.cc.o > [ 65%] Building CXX object > source/numerics/CMakeFiles/obj_numerics_debug.dir/solution_transfer.cc.o > [ 65%]

[deal.II] Re: Discrete Galekin with periodic boundary condition

2018-11-08 Thread Daniel Arndt
Jaekwang, In general, using periodic boundary conditions with MeshWorker should be pretty easy. All you would have to do is calling Triangulation.add_periodicity() with a parameter