Hi Konrad,
On Monday, September 30, 2019 at 3:55:20 PM UTC+2, Konrad Simon wrote:
>
> Thank you, Denis. I use a pretty stupid (but simple) workaround: I setup
> and compile deal.ii myself since all dependencies are compiled and use the
> cmake command used by spack. That works. And I do not get
Hi Alberto,
Such issues should ideally be reported to Perl, because that's the issue
with their package. Or at least to Spack in a hope that the community can
come up with some patch to workaround the build issue in Perl.
For you to go on simply tell Spack to use Perl from system:
perl:
Perfect! Thank you this was exactly what I was missing.
Amy
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-6, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
>
> Amy,
>
> > template
> > class BoundaryValuesU : public Function{
> >public:
>
> You are correct: You need to tell the base class how many vector
Amy,
> template
> class BoundaryValuesU : public Function{
> public:
You are correct: You need to tell the base class how many vector components
your function has. You should be able to do this by adding a constructor:
BoundaryValuesU ()
: Function (dim)// your function has
On 10/1/19 10:23 AM, Konrad Wiśniewski wrote:
>
> I'm looking for quick advise. In my calculations I solve two equations (in
> 2D)
> consecutively: the Poisson equation where I obtain electric field *E*, and
> then I solve the continuity equation where I obtain e.g. density of electrons
>
On 10/1/19 11:02 AM, Alberto Salvadori wrote:
>
> Can you perhaps provide suggestions on what possibly went wrong? To add
> further information, I did not add any limit version of suite-sparse, i.e.
It looks to me like spack fails while compiling Perl. I don't think there's
anything we can do
Dear community
I have been trying to install deal.ii on a linux machine equipped with
CentOS7. As very clearly explained in
" https://github.com/dealii/dealii/wiki/deal.II-in-Spack#check-before-build
"
I have installed the latest version of gcc, openmpi, cmake.
[deal.ii@localhost spack]$ gcc
Hi!
I'm looking for quick advise. In my calculations I solve two equations (in
2D) consecutively: the Poisson equation where I obtain electric field *E*,
and then I solve the continuity equation where I obtain e.g. density of
electrons *n*. I want to get current that is *j* = C*nE* where
Hi Amy,
I post below one possible solution which worked for me.
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 4:44:25 AM UTC+2, Amy Kaczmarowski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to apply a displacement boundary condition on a surface in
> my problem. However, I would like the direction of the displacement
