: Re: [deal.II] discontinous contour over elements
On 1/18/20 5:02 PM, David Eaton wrote:
> I just use tecplot directly visualize the results. The vorticity contour from
> my simple code is continuous, and the results from deal.II is discontinuous
> (without L2 projection).
Ah
?
From: Wolfgang Bangerth
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2020, 12:49 AM
To: David Eaton; dealii@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [deal.II] discontinous contour over elements
On 1/18/20 9:25 AM, David Eaton wrote:
> Thank you for your explanations. Basically I formed a weak form of the
, I am
puzzled at why I did not read it in the FEM books before.
Best
David
From: Wolfgang Bangerth
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2020, 11:58 PM
To: David Eaton; dealii@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [deal.II] discontinous contour over elements
On 1/17/20 9:11 PM
From: dealii@googlegroups.com on behalf of Wolfgang
Bangerth
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 12:05 AM
To: dealii@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [deal.II] discontinous contour over elements
On 1/14/20 10:04 PM, David Eaton wrote:
>
> Thank you for your suggestions. I am
points.
This is a procedure we use to set the initial conditions in Lethe when the
initial condition is a complex function (for instance a Taylor-Green vortex).
On Wednesday, 15 January 2020 11:22:52 UTC-5, David Eaton wrote:
I understand the C0 element is piecewise linear across elements. However
Subject: Re: [deal.II] discontinous contour over elements
On 1/15/20 9:22 AM, David Eaton wrote:
> I understand the C0 element is piecewise linear across elements. However, I
> did not experience the same issue in my own C++ code while I use C0 element
> with the Petrov Galerkin stabilizat
?
Thanks
D.
From: dealii@googlegroups.com on behalf of Wolfgang
Bangerth
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020, 12:05 AM
To: dealii@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [deal.II] discontinous contour over elements
On 1/14/20 10:04 PM, David Eaton wrote:
>
> Thank you fo
/0521113601)
Please feel free to reach out if you have more questions.
Best
Bruno
On Monday, 13 January 2020 20:29:53 UTC-5, David Eaton wrote:
Thanks Wolfgang and Praveen for providing suggestions. I have tried to
debugging this code for a while. I have attached this simple code on this
email. I
are using only C0
elements for the velocity.
If you are averaging the computed vorticity or obtaining vorticity by an L2
projection, then they would be continuous. Maybe your other codes are doing
something like this ?
Best
praveen
On 13-Jan-2020, at 9:12 AM, David Eaton
mailto:dealiidiscuss