Dear Jean-Paul, thanks again for your support and kind suggestions.
I have worked with MappingQEulerian some time before, and as I remember, I
dropped it because it requires the use of a vector field defined in the
whole domain in order to curve geometries.
After this, I started using
Dear Jean-Paul, thanks again for your support and kind suggestions.
I have worked with MappingQEulerian some time before, and as I remember, I
dropped it because it requires a vector field define in the whole domain in
order to curve the geometry.
After this, I started using ChartManifolds and
Dear Jean-Paul, thanks again for your support and kind suggestions.
I have worked with MappingQEulerian some time before, and as I remember, I
dropped it because it requires a vector field define in the whole domain in
order to curve the geometry.
After this, I started using ChartManifolds and
Dear Juan Carlos,
> If I interpret your mail correctly, your suggestion is using FunctionManifold
> in
> order to create the parametrization of the geometry. If this is the case, I
> have
> already done this step through my own class PolarShapeManifold (no code
> included).
> If you meant
Dear Jean-Paul, thank for your interest in my problem and your quick reply!
If I interpret your mail correctly, your suggestion is using
FunctionManifold in
order to create the parametrization of the geometry. If this is the case, I
have
already done this step through my own class
Dear all,
I would like your guidance on how to perform the assembly of different
shape representations on the same triangulation and on the same loop
through cells.
Let me try to explain a bit more.
I have designed a grid containing two concentric squares (or circles).
Additionally, I have a
