On 06/08/2016 09:26 AM, Marco Delchini wrote:
Our objective is to solve for two-phase flows in multi-D using a fully
implicit temporal scheme. In the short term, we would need the Trilinos
solver/perconditioner capabilities and also are very interested in the Sacado
package that does automatic d
Marco,
2016-06-08 10:26 GMT-04:00 Marco Delchini :
> What would be the main difference between Epetra and Tpetra? What would be
> the benefits of using Tpetra over Epetra?
With Tpetra, you can use Kokkos and you need Kokkos to run Trilinos on GPUs.
> Our objective is to solve for two-phase flows
Jean-Paul and Bruno,
thanks for your answer, this is helpful.
What would be the main difference between Epetra and Tpetra? What would be
the benefits of using Tpetra over Epetra?
Our objective is to solve for two-phase flows in multi-D using a fully
implicit temporal scheme. In the short term, w
Marco,
like Jean-Paul said the Trilinos wrappers are mainly for the linear
algebra. This doesn't mean that you can't use a package that we don't have
wrapper for. You can always get the underlying Trilinos object from the
wrapper and use it when you need to call another package. When you choose
Hi Marco,
Thats a good question. It doesn't look like its explicitly documented
anywhere as to which packages deal.II *requires* Trilinos to be built with
(i.e. utilises directly or offers some wrapped functionality for). I'll
make a note to do this on the GitHub repository.
Hints to the answ
