> On 12 Apr 2017, at 14:54, Sean McGovern wrote:
>
>
>> Would the general point be that if one can go to higher resolutions with
>> distributed parallelism that the enhanced accuracy of the enrichment
>> functions can be compensated for?
>
> Sorry, i did not get what you
> Would the general point be that if one can go to higher resolutions with
> distributed parallelism that the enhanced accuracy of the enrichment
> functions can be compensated for?
>
>
> Sorry, i did not get what you mean.
>
> Regards,
> Denis.
>
>
Hi Denis,
Thanks for your prompt answers.
I
Hi,
Thanks to you all for the feedback.
The ANS paper and the plans for sophisticated quadrature are great.
One further point of clarification:
I am new to XFEM, but have been interested in level sets for a while, in
particular in the distributed parallel context.
Do I understand correctly
Hi
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:20:13 AM UTC+2, Simon Sticko wrote:
>
> Hi.
> Regarding this:
>
> > On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 1:51:41 PM UTC+2, Denis Davydov wrote:
> >
> > The issue with integrating and quadrature would still remain.
>
>
> I've been implementing an algorithm to generate
Hi.
Regarding this:
> On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 1:51:41 PM UTC+2, Denis Davydov wrote:
>
> The issue with integrating and quadrature would still remain.
I've been implementing an algorithm to generate bulk and surface quadrature
given a level set function as boundary description. It's
> On 7 Apr 2017, at 03:09, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2017 06:14 AM, Daniel Arndt wrote:
>>I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it.
>>Maybe we can team up here.
>>
>> step-47 seems to be completed in the paper On the
On 04/06/2017 06:14 AM, Daniel Arndt wrote:
I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it.
Maybe we can team up here.
step-47 seems to be completed in the paper On the implementation of the
eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) for interface problems
David,
> Hopefully someone get to finish step-47 with XFEM. I am really interested
> in digging there and I put it on my own TODO list.
> I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it.
> Maybe we can team up here.
>
step-47 seems to be completed in the paper On the
Hi Sean,
Hopefully someone get to finish step-47 with XFEM. I am really interested
in digging there and I put it on my own TODO list.
I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it.
Maybe we can team up here.
My understanding that step-47 did all the book-keeping of