Re: [deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-12 Thread Denis Davydov
> On 12 Apr 2017, at 14:54, Sean McGovern wrote: > > >> Would the general point be that if one can go to higher resolutions with >> distributed parallelism that the enhanced accuracy of the enrichment >> functions can be compensated for? > > Sorry, i did not get what you

Re: [deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-12 Thread Sean McGovern
> Would the general point be that if one can go to higher resolutions with > distributed parallelism that the enhanced accuracy of the enrichment > functions can be compensated for? > > > Sorry, i did not get what you mean. > > Regards, > Denis. > > Hi Denis, Thanks for your prompt answers. I

Re: [deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-12 Thread Sean McGovern
Hi, Thanks to you all for the feedback. The ANS paper and the plans for sophisticated quadrature are great. One further point of clarification: I am new to XFEM, but have been interested in level sets for a while, in particular in the distributed parallel context. Do I understand correctly

Re: [deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-09 Thread Denis Davydov
Hi On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:20:13 AM UTC+2, Simon Sticko wrote: > > Hi. > Regarding this: > > > On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 1:51:41 PM UTC+2, Denis Davydov wrote: > > > > The issue with integrating and quadrature would still remain. > > > I've been implementing an algorithm to generate

Re: [deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-09 Thread Simon Sticko
Hi. Regarding this: > On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 1:51:41 PM UTC+2, Denis Davydov wrote: > > The issue with integrating and quadrature would still remain. I've been implementing an algorithm to generate bulk and surface quadrature given a level set function as boundary description. It's

Re: [deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-07 Thread Denis Davydov
> On 7 Apr 2017, at 03:09, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > On 04/06/2017 06:14 AM, Daniel Arndt wrote: >>I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it. >>Maybe we can team up here. >> >> step-47 seems to be completed in the paper On the

Re: [deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-06 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 04/06/2017 06:14 AM, Daniel Arndt wrote: I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it. Maybe we can team up here. step-47 seems to be completed in the paper On the implementation of the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) for interface problems

[deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-06 Thread Daniel Arndt
David, > Hopefully someone get to finish step-47 with XFEM. I am really interested > in digging there and I put it on my own TODO list. > I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it. > Maybe we can team up here. > step-47 seems to be completed in the paper On the

[deal.II] Re: fe_enriched and step-47

2017-04-06 Thread Denis Davydov
Hi Sean, Hopefully someone get to finish step-47 with XFEM. I am really interested in digging there and I put it on my own TODO list. I don't know if Wolfgang, the author of the tutorial, plan to finish it. Maybe we can team up here. My understanding that step-47 did all the book-keeping of