Does anyone have version 7.3.0 of dealII and if so, would be able to share
it, please?
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
ething to do with the version of dealii.
> >
> > 在 2017年9月1日星期五 UTC+8上午3:52:44，John写道：
> >
> > Timo,
> >
> > I do eventually plan on updating the code to the latest release.
> > I was doing the commands inside a folder in deal.II (similar to i
updating the code to deal.II version 8.1.0, which it is currently running
successfully on, and am now working on updating to 8.5. Thank you for all
of your help!
On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:35:07 PM UTC-4, Bruno Turcksin wrote:
>
> John,
>
> 2017-09-02 11:07 GMT-04:00
UTC-4, 曾元圆 wrote:
>
> hi John,
> have you solve this problem? I encountered the same problem as you.
> Actually I'm following an FEM open course on coursera and I'm trying to
> compile the source code in the homework. I have installed the dealii just a
> few days ago so I
Hello everyone,
I am currently using Deal II version 8.0.0. When I try to run a project I
am getting the following:
Exception on processing:
An error occurred in line <379> of file
Timo,
I do eventually plan on updating the code to the latest release.
I was doing the commands inside a folder in deal.II (similar to if I was in
deal.II/examples/step-1). I already have deal.II installed and compiled. I
have been going through a few of the examples perfectly fine. Should I
Greetings,
I was wondering, does deal.ii has support for solving tensor equations
directly? For instance, I am interested in using DG to solve for the stress
tensor in the Oldroyd-B model, and I was wondering if I need to write the
code to solve for the components of the stress tensor, or if
vector fe_function at the given point point, and return the (vector)
value of this function through the last argument.
Best,
John.
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You re
the same. I ruled out the possibility of mistake (the program prints
fe.degree) and began worrying. I think VectorTools::point_value is to blame
probably…
Is there a replacement for it?
Best,
John
On Monday, April 19, 2021 at 4:59:25 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 4/18/21 7:43
or a book which describes the exact FE_Nedelec
implementation of deal.ii?
Best,
John
On Monday, April 19, 2021 at 5:49:24 PM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 4/18/21 10:50 PM, John Smith wrote:
> > Then I have fed this solution together with the dof handler to the
> > VectorToo
Dear Jean-Paul,
Thanks! It is indeed a trap.
John
On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 9:23:23 PM UTC+2 Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Unfortunately, you’ve fallen into the trap of confusing what the entries
> in the solution vector mean for the different element types.
tried as a test to project the magnetic field of a magnetic dipole
on a cuboidal domain using the dim- component Function following example of
Simon and VectorTools::interpolate. It looks ok … But I will be extra
careful checking the projections made by this interpolation function.
Thanks!
John
lt;3> & p,
Vector< double > & values ) const override;
};
That was a bad idea ...
Thanks! Now it works! Problem solved!
Best,
John.
On Friday, April 16, 2021 at 5:28:43 PM UTC+2 simon...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't have any experience with FE_Nedel
Otherwise, the
simulation is numerically unstable. The last, from my experience, is
definitely true.
Best,
John
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 5:28 PM simon...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't have any experience with FE_Nedelec, but the error message states
> that the function you are trying
= double]*
*The violated condition was: *
* dof_handler.get_fe().n_components() == function.n_components*
*Additional information: *
* Dimension 3 not equal to 1.*
Looks like VectorTools::interpolate does not like the vector-valued finite
elements. Could you please point me in the right
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you for your reply. It is a bit difficult to read formulas in text.
So I have put a few questions I have in a pdf file. Formulas are better
there. It is attached to this message. May I ask you to have a look at it?
Best,
John
On Friday, April 16, 2021 at 10:26:51 PM UTC
Dear Wolfgang,
I have made a silly mistake. Thank you for pointing out this mistake! The
shape functions indeed look fine!
I apologize for wasting time your time like that …
Best wishes,
John
On Friday, April 23, 2021 at 1:21:42 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> > For t
17 matches
Mail list logo
