Dear Timo.
thank you very much.
I removed the check on the cell when setting the boundary indicators
and now it is working correctly in parallel.
Thank you.
Best,
Roberto
On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 10:35:05 AM UTC-4, Timo Heister wrote:
>
> Roberto,
>
> you are setting boundary ids only
Roberto,
you are setting boundary ids only for locally owned cells. I assume
this means your constraint matrix will be inconsistent because of
that.
Can you check what happens if you use the correct boundary indices on
all processors?
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Roberto Porcù wrote:
> Dea
Dear Lucas,
thanks very much for replying.
I tried to solve the same problem without rotating the domain. I rotated
the problem.
Unfortunately the issue is still there.
I attach the new images.
I also attach the source code again because I realized that the previous
one had a misplaced bracke
Dear Roberto,
I think the problem is that you are using GridTools::transform (via
GridTools::rotate), in a distributed triangulation. This should not be
done, as noted
here:
https://www.dealii.org/8.5.0/doxygen/deal.II/namespaceGridTools.html#a212e99cf0d923cebfa04f1d23fa60b04
If this is indee
Dear all,
in the reply to my first post I forgot the code.
I attach it to this reply.
Best
Roberto P.
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 7:27:37 PM UTC-5, Roberto Porcù wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm solving a linear elasticity problem on a cracked domain created by
> means
> of the GridGenera
Dear all,
since I am still experiencing the same issue, I tried to solve a very
simple and basic problem
on a domain created with the GridGenerator::hyper_cube_slit and then
rotated of -90 degrees.
As you can see in the attached figures I am experiencing the same issue:
when I run
the prog
