Re: Proposed final DebConf 22 budget

2022-09-10 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)

On 2022/09/10 10:36, stefa...@debian.org wrote:

Hi Jonathan (2022.09.10_08:24:42_+)

Cheap swag just ends up in a drawer or in the trash, it's not worth it
imho.

I think that tends to be things that the sponsors have provided, rather
than us. As I said in the other mail, I don't know if this is actually
fixable. I think it requires the sponsors to be more engaged in our
needs than is practical.


To a degree yes, but also from our side. Things like low quality water 
bottles and low quality t-shirts. I don't think any DebConf team member 
should ever have any pressure on them to reduce quality to reduce costs 
on things like them. If anything, they should be re-assured that we have 
enough funds left from previous DebConfs to do something nice, and if 
anything, we can go the extra mile and get some well designed t-shirts 
(as in, add some extra stitching, Debian logos on sleeves, that kind of 
thing) as apposed to just a plain conference t-shirt that most of us 
already have too many of.


-Jonathan



Re: Proposed final DebConf 22 budget

2022-09-10 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)

On 2022/09/10 01:02, Gunnar Wolf wrote:

FWIW, we have been adding "traditions" and expectations to DebConf,
and I don't think we should be expected to keep them all always. As
for "traditions", I'm thinking about the final barbeque(sp?); I often
love it as a last opportunity to be together and enjoy (and, ahem, to
lose the only set of keys to a room locked with German engineerng
:-Þ), but I think a barbeque should only be held if we end up having a
bit extra income. Of course, it has to be organized for some time
before the conf actually happens... but then gain, you saw that some
people (infeedback@dc.o) didn't get the notice -- is it an official
activity or not? If it is official, it should be part of the
conference's scheduling...


I like the idea of the BBQ, it worked especially great at DC19, it was 
very relaxed, wide varfiety of food, a nice chance to just deflate a 
little before traveling and going back home.


As for 'official', urgh, that word keeps getting overloaded in Debian. 
In terms of being part of the formal program, no, I wouldn't consider it 
as such, or consider it a necessity for anyone to attend if they want to 
be considered a full conference attendee (like if they want an 
attendance certificate, or whatever). So, it should certainly be 
announced, on the schedule, but not compulsory. Another benefit is that 
have to leave on a Sunday (assuming that's when things end) don't have 
to miss an important part of the programme. So as you might have 
guessed, I'm very much in favour of such a tradition.


As for swag, I'd rather like to see more money spent on swag. Not 
necessarily on more swag, but better quality swag. Some DebConf events 
put some effort into it and many of us still use our mugs all the way 
from DC12 and glasses from DC19 etc. Even my DC18 towel came in really 
handy the last week wen I tried to keep my ears warm. Cheap swag just 
ends up in a drawer or in the trash, it's not worth it imho.


-Jonathan



Re: Proposed final DebConf 22 budget

2022-08-12 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)

On 2022/08/12 19:00, stefa...@debian.org wrote:

Just a few questions:

* fees - saw quite a sharp increase, what is this made up of?

See the comments in budget.ledger, it's for two things:
1. SPI's 5% cut (which we account in fees)
2. Expected travel reimbursement costs (currency conversion and bank
fees). A wild thumb-suck, here.


* swag - this is up by 50%, what happened here, did something end up more
expensive than expected?

 From what I can tell, swag cost us twice as much per-person as we
budgeted, but we only provided for 300 people, not 400.


Ah thanks, other than that I'm familiar with the other changes, I'll go 
ahead and approve the updated budget...


-Jonathan



Re: Proposed final DebConf 22 budget

2022-08-12 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)

Hi Stefano

On 2022/08/11 16:19, Stefano Rivera wrote:

You can see how this compares to the last approved version in this MR:
https://salsa.debian.org/debconf-team/public/data/dc22/-/merge_requests/3


Just a few questions:

* fees - saw quite a sharp increase, what is this made up of?

* swag - this is up by 50%, what happened here, did something end up 
more expensive than expected?


-Jonathan



Re: Proposed final DebConf 22 budget

2022-08-12 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)

Hi all,

On 2022/08/11 16:19, Stefano Rivera wrote:

EUR 39,274.65  assets:debian-france
   EUR 188,984.35  expenses
EUR 16,100.00accommodation
 EUR 3,780.00  debcamp
EUR 12,320.00  debconf
 EUR 7,500.00day trip
 EUR 2,500.00  bus
 EUR 5,000.00  tour guide
 EUR 5,724.35fees
EUR 50,000.00food
EUR 15,750.00  debcamp
EUR 33,250.00  debconf
 EUR 1,000.00  refreshments
 EUR 3,000.00graphic materials
   EUR 950.00hacklab-bar
 EUR 2,500.00incidentals
 EUR 1,200.00local team
 EUR 7,460.00party
   EUR 500.00  cheese and wine
 EUR 4,960.00  conference dinner
   EUR 250.00bus
 EUR 3,910.00food
   EUR 800.00music
 EUR 2,000.00  social event
 EUR 2,500.00reimbursable:sponsor imports
   EUR 300.00sponsor fulfilment
EUR 12,000.00swag
EUR 60,650.00travel
EUR 42,500.00  bursary
EUR 15,500.00diversity
EUR 27,000.00general
EUR 18,150.00  team
 EUR 6,500.00dc23
 EUR 1,500.00debconf-ctte
   EUR 650.00registration
 EUR 9,500.00video
EUR 16,600.00venue
EUR 12,500.00  av equipment
   EUR 200.00  covid tests
   EUR 100.00  hygiene
   EUR 600.00  internet
 EUR 3,200.00  tents
 EUR 2,500.00video
 EUR 1,000.00  computers
 EUR 1,500.00  shipping
  EUR -228,259.00  income
EUR -8,100.00accommodation
EUR -1,404.00hacklab-bar
EUR -8,438.00meals
EUR -8,500.00registration
EUR -2,500.00reimbursement:sponsor imports
  EUR -199,317.00sponsors
EUR -7,600.00  bronze
   EUR -40,000.00  gold
   EUR -80,000.00  platinum
   EUR -66,300.00  silver
EUR -5,417.00  supporter

0


Updated budget approved.

-Jonathan



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Name tags early at DebCamp

2018-06-19 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
On 19/06/2018 15:47, Yao Wei wrote:
> Our name tag is designed to be printed on-demand, and we will set that
> up within hours.
Ah, fantastic!

-Jonathan

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.



Name tags early at DebCamp

2018-06-19 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hi!

Feedback from both DC16 and DC17 were that name tags should have ideally
been available way earlier (ideally in the first 1-3 days of DebCamp
already).

Will it be possible to have nametags from the start (or close to it) for
DebCamp?

-Jonathan

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.



Re: Congratulations to "Towel day" (Was: Towels for DebConf 18)

2018-05-23 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hey Andreas

On 23/05/2018 07:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
> today is "Towel day"[1]! Yeah!
> 
> I wonder how the idea to have Debian towels for DebConf progressed.  I
> admit I did not followed up but I remain on thinking that this is a
> really cool idea.  I have not much time but if it needs some more hand
> to realise this I try to do my best.

AFAIR the minimum quantities killed it this time around. With typical
minimum orders of around a 1000 to keep it somewhat cost-efficient,
that's a lot of extra (space-taking) towels for someone to lug back
somewhere after DebConf.

-Jonathan

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.



Re: DebConf19 Bid decision meeting

2018-01-04 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
On 04/01/2018 18:51, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:28:58PM +0200, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
>> For Bratislava, this gives them
>> a chance to have their bid scrutinized, even though they really intend
>> to bid for next year.
> 
> frankly, I'm not sure this is sensible. It might work this year, when we
> have time as there is only one bid, but normally we wont have time for
> this… 

There is some flexibility in the process year-on-year. This is how we're
doing it this year. I'm hoping that next year we'll have at least two
strong bids, we might have to do some better marketing at DebConf to
lure^Wentice more people into proposing bids.

> also I think bid teams should be clear what they want and offer. saying
> "we might be bidding but maybe not" or some such is not helpful.
> 
> also why should we invest our time in this bid if *they* are not clear
> if they want to be bidding?

As far as I'm concerned, we have a sufficient understanding of where the
bid teams stand in order to have a productive meeting and a high
likelihood of reaching a consensus/conclusion on who should host DebConf19.

Even though Bratislava is really gunning for DC20, and even though it's
more or less a dry run for their actual bid, it is also valuable to
assess their current readiness in the (unlikely) event that the Curitiba
bid doesn't work out.

-Jonathan

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.



Re: DebConf19 Bid decision meeting

2018-01-04 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hi Holger

On 04/01/2018 18:16, Holger Levsen wrote:
> there's only one bid on that page?!

Kind of

> (and an entry under "damp run" which I'm not sure what that means,
> literally and in this context.)

It's a dry run for Bratislava (I suppose the 'damp' refers to it being
slightly less than a dry run).

The meeting still needs to take place in order to ensure that the
Curitiba bid is valid and that the rest of the checks and balances that
occur during this meeting still happens. For Bratislava, this gives them
a chance to have their bid scrutinized, even though they really intend
to bid for next year.

It might seem like a bit of a rouse, but it's important to confirm that
Curitiba's bid is valid and that there are no showstoppers. Currently
the confidence in the Curitiba bid is really high though so if you want
to see it as just a confirmation meeting, I guess that's not completely
unfair, but in reality it's a bit more than that.

Hope that helps :)

-Jonathan

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.



DebConf19 Bid decision meeting

2018-01-04 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Dear DebConf committee, DebConf team, DebConf bid teams and other
wonderful people who may be lurking

By consensus during the DebConf team meeting today, the DC19 bid
decision meeting is set:

 * Date: 2018-01-25
 * Time: 14:30 UTC
 * Place: #debconf-team on oftc
 * DebConf19 wiki containing bid links:
   https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf19

See you there!

-Jonathan
-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.