Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > The reason for this well explained here > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsXyRwhnJXc starting from 1:40ish Interesting. As long as we're sharing videos, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRTS503KnQw is a good

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > It's great to see this spurt of activity on the mailing list. But I have to > say > that it's around eight months too late to decide to be testing nageru at > DebConf 17. We're operating under a very, very limited

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > If we have energy to dev and test during DebConf17, we should work on > areas where we are actually having problems: During DC17 is before DC18. And there's usually a full week of time and hacking during

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I mean network bandwidth for people watching the stream, not memory > bandwidth. > > Last year, people complained at first because there was no 240p stream. We > added it. Ah sorry. Yes, there need to be different output

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

* Richard Hartmann [2017-06-27 21:05:07 +0200]: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Kyle Robbertze wrote: > > > > The opsis will support 1080p through an SDI add-on board that has just > > been funded. [1] > > We're looking at a $450 board

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 06:45:30PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > For clarity, I'm not just talking about performance; I'm also talking > > about the fact that mixing FullHD video on a single FullHD monitor is > >

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Kyle Robbertze wrote: > > The opsis will support 1080p through an SDI add-on board that has just > been funded. [1] We're looking at a $450 board which is fragile enough that Debian already owns a broken one and the supplier recommends N+2.

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On 2017-06-27 12:45, Richard Hartmann wrote: >> We should definitely install nageru onto one (or more) of the machines, >> and test it out during off hours. But only during off hours; for this >> year, we should prioritize recording on voctomix, not nageru. > I agree with prioritizating vocto

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On 27/06/2017 20:40, David Noble wrote: > Hi > > 2017-06-27 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kyle Robbertze : >> The opsis will support 1080p through an SDI add-on board that has just >> been funded. [1] > > Just FYI, AJA have released the U-Tap[1], which is a standard UVC > device that

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

Hi 2017-06-27 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kyle Robbertze : > The opsis will support 1080p through an SDI add-on board that has just > been funded. [1] Just FYI, AJA have released the U-Tap[1], which is a standard UVC device that can capture 3G-SDI, and appears to be cheaper than the

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On 2017-06-27 15:46:47 (+), David Noble wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 at 17:33, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I dont understand, voctomix can do this too, today. Can you please explain > > in more detail? > > > Nageru supports hardware accelerated

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Richard Hartmann wrote: >> - The team developing gstreamer and voctomix is larger than "just >> Sesse". We've just moved away from dvswitch that suffered from the >> "not enough developers" problem; we shouldn't move to another

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > For clarity, I'm not just talking about performance; I'm also talking > about the fact that mixing FullHD video on a single FullHD monitor is > difficult, so you'd need to have two monitors, or a 4K one, or to scale > your

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > I dont understand, voctomix can do this too, today. Can you please explain > in more detail? >From tests I remember from years ago, 1080p50 was too much data for vocto to handle and LCA ran into issues with desyncs

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Kyle Robbertze wrote: > As far as I understand it, the 1080p+ is simply a firmware change, so I > assume that can be done at a later stage, if and when we need 1080p. >From what I know, the Opsis board uses USB 2.0[1], which maxes out at 480

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 04:32:19PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Dear all, > > I low-level lurk -video and, of course, read Planet Debian. Full > disclosure, I also helped Sesse with his Prometheus[1] integration in > anticipation of needing that in February 2018. > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 at 17:33, Holger Levsen wrote: I dont understand, voctomix can do this too, today. Can you please explain > in more detail? Nageru supports hardware accelerated mixing and encoding, this allows full frame rate recording and streaming, without too much

Re: [Debconf-video] Testing Nageru in parallel during DC17? [was: (Re: Report from last week-end's single-user single-day DebConf Video sprint)]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 04:32:19PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: [1080p] > This does seem to be within easy reach even today, given Nageru's[2] > performance characteristics. I dont understand, voctomix can do this too, today. Can you please explain in more detail? -- cheers, Holger